For Operators
Continuing Airworthiness Without the Records Drag
Whether you operate corporate aircraft under Part 91 or charter under Part 135, the records that prove airworthiness are large, fragmented, and unforgiving. Manual review surfaces discrepancies late, audits become rushed, and transactions stall over questions that better records would have already answered.
Part 91 and 135 records aren't just a transaction problem — they're a continuous-airworthiness problem. ADs and SBs accumulate, life-limited parts cycle, modifications add up, and the documentation chain grows in parallel. Without structured tooling, every FAA surveillance visit, insurance audit, or sale becomes a fire drill.
What this supports
- Continuing airworthiness oversight (Part 91 and 135)
- FAA surveillance, insurance, and customer audits
- Aircraft sale, purchase, and induction
- Charter management and lessee handover
The problem: aircraft records are high-volume, fragmented, and unstructured.
Critical information is distributed across scanned documents, inconsistent formats, and multiple sources. Verification requires reconstructing maintenance and compliance history across:
- Airworthiness Directives (ADs) and Service Bulletins (SBs)
- Life-limited parts (LLPs) and hard-time components
- Repairs, modifications, and STCs
- Task cards and maintenance program alignment
- 8110s, 8130s, and supporting documentation
Manual review is time-intensive and often surfaces discrepancies late, when timelines are constrained and costs escalate.
What we do
Analyze records at scale
Ingest and process full records datasets, including large, unstructured document sets. Extract and link maintenance, compliance, and certification data across sources.
Identify and structure discrepancies
Detect missing, inconsistent, or unverifiable elements. Each finding is structured with affected component, source document, confidence, operational and financial impact, and recommended next action.
Provide operator-specific visibility
Deliver outputs tailored to records, maintenance, fleet, asset, and finance stakeholders. Each audience sees the cuts of the data that drive their decisions.
Drive resolution
Move beyond analysis to execution. Coordinate with DERs, DARs, MROs, and other parties; source missing documentation; and manage resolution workflows end-to-end where required. Execution is supported by EE Atlas, our integrated marketplace.
Engagement
Engagements begin with a scoped initial phase and scale by results. Forward-deployed engineers, records specialists, and domain experts work directly with your team. Following initial engagement, workflows are streamlined and productized where possible.
Typical turnaround
24–72 hours
Depending on scope and data complexity.
Outcomes
Next step
Talk to us about your specific workflow.
We'll walk through your current state, the records or compliance footprint involved, and outline a scoped initial engagement.