DO-160G review
DO-160F to DO-160G delta review for equipment suppliers
This page is for equipment suppliers, avionics suppliers, Certification teams when Legacy report offered on a new program puts do-160f to do-160g delta review on the critical path. EE checks DO-160 section matrix, legacy qualification report, revision delta memo against the approval basis, configuration baseline, effectivity, revision status, and source records named in the brief. The buyer receives a discrepancy register, evidence map, and closure request list for the next review gate. The work tests records and certification-data traceability only; it does not replace authority, delegate, approval-holder, or authorized-person decisions.
When this review is needed
- Use this review when Legacy report offered on a new program starts driving schedule or commercial exposure.
- An equipment supplier with a legacy qualification report searching for what changed between DO-160F and G and whether retest is required.
- The highest-risk breakpoint is: revision-letter equivalence assumed globally when specific sections changed materially, TSO revisions pinning a different DO-160 revision than the one tested, and delta memos that list changes without dispositioning them.
The problem
At this gate, can qualification reports written against DO-160F (or earlier) support a new program that cites DO-160G, section by section, or is retest unavoidable. The file set covers the sections cited by the applicable TSO or certification basis, section-level changes between revisions that affect test methods or levels, the original report's categories against the new requirement, and the delta justification for each carried-over section. Known breakpoints include revision-letter equivalence assumed globally when specific sections changed materially, TSO revisions pinning a different DO-160 revision than the one tested, and delta memos that list changes without dispositioning them.
What gets reviewed
- Review the buyer decision in the brief: Determine section by section whether DO-160F evidence carries to a DO-160G requirement and document the deltas.
- Trace DO-160 section matrix to source date, revision, owner, and current configuration.
- Match effectivity for legacy qualification report to the serial range, article version, aircraft, or fleet in scope.
- At this gate, can qualification reports written against DO-160F (or earlier) support a new program that cites DO-160G, section by section, or is retest unavoidable.
Scope this review
Tell us the asset, the event, and the evidence in scope, and we will outline a focused first engagement.
Identify what is missing against the means of compliance.
What gets validated
- Source trail: DO-160 section matrix is tied to a dated record, stated revision, and custodian.
- Applicability: legacy qualification report is limited to the exact serials, models, article versions, or fleet group proven by the file.
- Revision fit: drawings, reports, instructions, releases, and matrix rows are compared for mixed baselines.
- Open-item treatment: assumptions are marked for use, limitation, escalation, or replacement evidence.
Evidence normally required
- Source record set for DO-160 section matrix
- Program file covering legacy qualification report
- Configuration baseline with approval basis and revision index
- Open issue log tied to revision delta memo
Common discrepancies
- The file set covers the sections cited by the applicable TSO or certification basis, section-level changes between revisions that affect test methods or levels, the.
- Known breakpoints include revision-letter equivalence assumed globally when specific sections changed materially, TSO revisions pinning a different DO-160 revision than the one.
- Revision mismatch leaves revision delta memo separated from the certificate, matrix, instruction, or delivered baseline.
- Storage completeness is higher than decision readiness because the file lacks a clear disposition for this buying stage.
What is at stake
Specific exposure for this page: revision-letter equivalence assumed globally when specific sections changed materially, TSO revisions pinning a different DO-160 revision than the one tested, and delta memos that list changes without dispositioning them.
How the work runs
Frame 160f 160g
Confirm the exact event, affected file set, buyer role, and decision standard before any do-160 section matrix is treated as sufficient.
Trace Review Equipment
Walk the named evidence from index entry to source artifact and mark where the trail supports, conflicts with, or fails to answer the page-specific question.
Sort Reuse Old
Group exceptions by closure route: document retrieval, data correction, engineering disposition, authority response, or contractual decision.
Package Retest 160
Deliver the exception list, evidence map, and owner sequence in a form that can move directly into remediation, submittal cleanup, or transaction negotiation.
What the buyer receives
- DO-160F to DO-160G delta review discrepancy register
- source map for DO-160 section matrix
- effectivity and configuration closure list
- decision summary with limits and escalation items
How the work fits into the transaction or program
Can qualification reports written against DO-160F (or earlier) support a new program that cites DO-160G, section by section, or is retest unavoidable. The evidence set centers on the sections cited by the applicable TSO or certification basis, section-level changes between revisions that affect test methods or levels, the original report's categories against the new requirement, and the delta justification for each carried-over section. The likely weak points are revision-letter equivalence assumed globally when specific sections changed materially, TSO revisions pinning a different DO-160 revision than the one tested, and delta memos that list changes without dispositioning them. The output gives the qualification engineer a cleanup register for DO-160F to DO-160G delta review for equipment suppliers before legacy report offered on a new program.
Start with a single asset
Confirm requirements map to substantiating evidence.
Regulatory limits
For do-160f to do-160g delta review, EE reviews DO-160 section matrix, legacy qualification report, revision delta memo for completeness, consistency, and traceability. The work does not issue approvals, approve data, grant relief, validate STCs, accept release certificates, or make airworthiness determinations. Final decisions remain with the responsible authority, delegate, approval holder, operator, or authorized person.
Specific to this review
- At this gate, can qualification reports written against DO-160F (or earlier) support a new program that cites DO-160G, section by section, or is retest.
- The file set covers the sections cited by the applicable TSO or certification basis, section-level changes between revisions that affect test methods or.
- Known breakpoints include revision-letter equivalence assumed globally when specific sections changed materially, TSO revisions pinning a different DO-160 revision.
- The scope uses the 160f 160g Delta Review question as the control point, so the review stays tied to Legacy report offered on a new program and the buyer decision behind it.
- The evidence starts with DO-160 section matrix and follows Equipment Suppliers Reuse Old references until every exception has a source location and a reason code.
- The finding logic separates missing paperwork, conflicting status, stale revision data, and unsupported disposition because each class closes through a different owner.
- The timing matters for qualification engineer: the output is useful only if the unresolved items are visible before acceptance, submittal, handback, or negotiation pressure fixes the sequence.
- The boundary control keeps Reports Retest 160 Revision questions in the records or certification lane and sends technical acceptance issues to the authorized people who own them.
- The handoff value comes from DO-160F to DO-160G delta review discrepancy register; it gives the next reviewer a precise map instead of another broad request for a better file.
- The source discipline is stricter on this page than on a general audit because the claim being tested is Determine section by section whether DO-160F evidence carries to a DO-160G requirement and document the deltas..
Sources
Frequently asked questions
What makes this standards review different from a general file audit?
The scope is tied to 160f 160g delta review and to the decision named in the request. A general audit can list weak records; this pass ranks the gaps by whether they block legacy report offered on a new program or can be closed later without changing the decision.
What evidence has to be available before this work starts?
The starting point is do-160 section matrix, the current status source, and any index or matrix that tells reviewers where the supporting artifact should live. Missing inputs are logged as findings rather than filled with assumptions.
Who decides whether an open item is acceptable?
The review explains what the evidence supports and gives qualification engineer a closure path. Acceptance remains with the buyer, operator, authority, delegated engineer, or authorized person responsible for the underlying airworthiness or certification decision.
Relevant glossary terms
Related pages
Where this fits
Talk to an engineer who has done this work
We will walk through your current state, the records or evidence involved, and a scoped first engagement.
Talk through the aircraft, records, evidence, deadline, and next useful step.