Equipment & Avionics Certification
Equipment and avionics certification data support
Certification-data support for equipment and avionics suppliers: evidence review, compliance-matrix and means-of-compliance mapping, traceability, and finding closure across TSO and STC workflows. Each page covers a specific workflow, evidence set, standard, or finding.
Certification workflows
TSO, STC, and approval workflows and the evidence each one requires.
TSO certification data support for equipment suppliersA TSO authorization stands or falls on its data package. We structure the basis, build the compliance matrix, and gap-chFirst TSO authorization data support for avionics suppliersFirst TSO authorization data support for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closReview of supplier AD response data support for avionics suppliersSupplier AD response data support for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closureEmbodied STC conformity records review for operatorsEmbodied STC conformity records review for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure pacMRO repair data substantiation support for mrosMRO repair data substantiation support for mros, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package Orphaned STC airworthiness data review for operatorsOrphaned STC airworthiness data review for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure pacReview of STC flight test readiness review for avionics suppliersSTC flight test readiness review for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure AD compliance path assessment for operatorsAD compliance path assessment for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package for MRO STC kit data readiness review for mrosMRO STC kit data readiness review for mros, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package for tAMOC application data support for operatorsAMOC application data support for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package for AD terminating action STC data support for equipment suppliersAD terminating action STC data support for equipment suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a cModification approval route assessment for operatorsModification approval route assessment for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure pacForeign STC validation data support for avionics suppliersForeign STC validation data support for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closuLessor STC consent review for lessorsLessor STC consent review for lessors, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package for the neReview of STC portfolio acquisition diligence for investorsSTC portfolio acquisition diligence for investors, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure packagAML STC fleet coverage mapping for avionics suppliersAML STC fleet coverage mapping for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure paReview of STC product opportunity assessment for avionics suppliersSTC product opportunity assessment for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closurAD exemption petition data support for operatorsAD exemption petition data support for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure packageMulti-STC compatibility data review for mrosMulti-STC compatibility data review for mros, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package forReview of supplier certification data oversight for oemsSupplier certification data oversight for oems, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package fObsolete part approval route assessment for pma suppliersObsolete part approval route assessment for pma suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closurTC program certification data support for oemsTC program certification data support for oems, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package fAFM supplement stack review for operatorsAFM supplement stack review for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package for thCross-authority AD and STC mapping for operatorsCross-authority AD and STC mapping for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure packageAirline fleet modification data review for airlinesAirline fleet modification data review for airlines, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure packAvionics installer data package support for avionics suppliersAvionics installer data package support for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a cReview of installed STC portfolio review for lessors for lessorsInstalled STC portfolio review for lessors for lessors, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure pReview of STC ICA maintenance program incorporation review for camosSTC ICA maintenance program incorporation review for camos, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closuDesign organization surveillance readiness for oemsDesign organization surveillance readiness for oems, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure packCabin equipment certification data support for equipment suppliersCabin equipment certification data support for equipment suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, andPMA catalog certification data support for pma suppliersPMA catalog certification data support for pma suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closureFleet STC embodiment records planning for airlinesFleet STC embodiment records planning for airlines, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure packaAvionics supplier certification data support for avionics suppliersAvionics supplier certification data support for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, anCertification basis impact for an approved STC changeNeed stc change basis assessment before commitment? EE checks the evidence, records unsupported claims, and returns an aOperator review of an STC kit and data packageNeed purchased stc package review before installation? EE checks the evidence, records unsupported claims, and returns aAffected-fleet and compliance-option review for an AD-driven STCNeed ad-driven stc demand assessment for suppliers? EE checks the evidence, records unsupported claims, and returns an aApproved-data review for STC removal and configuration restorationNeed stc removal records review before redelivery? EE checks the evidence, records unsupported claims, and returns an acPost-certification data and ICA obligation review for STC holdersNeed stc holder obligation audit after issuance? EE checks the evidence, records unsupported claims, and returns an actiOperator review of terminating modifications versus repeated AD inspectionsNeed terminating mod assessment for repetitive ads? EE checks the evidence, records unsupported claims, and returns an aSTC certification data support for modifiers and suppliersAssembling an STC package? We help modifiers and suppliers order installation compliance data, then run a gap assessmentAML STC expansion support: adding models to an approved listAdding aircraft to an approved model list means proving eligibility and the delta per model. Get a per-model assessment Certification evidence review before authority submittalGet an independent read of qualification, software, and hardware data before submittal: findings on what is missing, incCertification-basis mapping for a certification programMiss a special condition now and it surfaces as a finding later. Get a documented certification basis, each requirement Means-of-compliance mapping for each requirementTest, analysis, inspection, or demonstration: pick wrong and the schedule pays. We map every requirement to its complianCertification-plan review before authority engagementCertification plan commitments bind a program for years. We flag where yours over-commits, under-specifies, or diverges Compliance-matrix review for a supplier submissionStale citations sink supplier matrices at submittal. We check every entry for coverage and live evidence, returning eachCertification-data traceability review for equipment suppliersOne broken trace can stall a submittal. We walk each requirement through design, verification, and evidence to map forwaConformity-evidence readiness review for test and inspectionConformity inspections often fail on records, not hardware. We check the article, build records, and conformity statemenAuthority-submittal readiness review before you fileFile too early and the findings cycle starts. We review the data package and compliance reports, then call it: go or no-Finding-closure support for certification programsFindings that reopen every review cycle drain a program. We map each open finding to the evidence it lacks and sequence Continued-airworthiness deliverables review for approval holdersDesign approval in hand, in-service obligations begin. We assess ICA, life limits, and service information against the bICA development and review for modifications and equipmentAn ICA mechanics cannot follow comes back as a finding. We draft or review your instructions for continued airworthinessInstallation-approval support for equipment on an aircraftAn approved article is not an approved installation. We build the interface, environment, and approval-path data that tiMajor-change evidence support for certified articlesCall a major change minor and the approval unravels later. We classify the change, scope the certification basis it reopQualification-evidence review for airborne equipmentA DO-160 category that misses the real installation environment means retest. We map your qualification coverage categorCertification record validation for approved articlesRecords that drift from the approved configuration surface at audit or transfer. We inventory the file and map each recoApproval-data validation for installations and alterationsApproved or merely acceptable? The wrong call stalls a sign-off. We check every reference behind an installation or alteType-design data-package readiness for certified productsSubmitting a type-design package with gaps invites findings. We assess your definition, configuration items, and supportField-approval data support for one-off alterationsYour one-off alteration needs defensible data for the field-approval route. We assemble the substantiation package and rSoftware certification liaison support for airborne softwareAn SOI review is a bad place to discover plan gaps. We assess your PSAC and lifecycle data for review readiness against Hardware certification liaison support for airborne electronic hardwareEach DO-254 stage of involvement expects specific artifacts. We assess your PHAC and design data for review readiness anCompliance matrix support for TSO authorizationYour TSO compliance matrix is what the FAA reads first. We check coverage and evidence currency against the basis and naCertification plan support for TSO authorizationA TSO certification plan that promises data you cannot deliver invites findings. We test basis, affected areas, and commMeans-of-compliance map support for TSO authorizationRequirements with no valid method, or a method with no evidence path, sink TSO reviews. We map each method to its proof Requirements traceability support for TSO authorizationDerived and changed requirements are where TSO traces break. We walk requirement-to-design-to-verification links both waVerification traceability support for TSO authorizationA requirement marked verified with no test, analysis, or inspection record behind it will not survive FAA scrutiny. Get DO-160G qualification report support for TSO authorizationDO-160G qualification fails late when categories miss the claimed installation. We compare each category and test limit DO-178C software lifecycle data support for TSO authorizationSoftware level drives which DO-178C objectives your TSO article owes. We audit plans, verification records, and the accoDO-254 hardware lifecycle data support for TSO authorizationA TSO article's DO-254 data must hold at the assigned DAL. We vet plans, design data, and verification against that DAL'Safety assessment support for TSO authorizationFHA, PSSA, and SSA results that do not tie to requirements and verification leave a TSO safety case open to challenge. WConfiguration management data support for TSO authorizationIf baselines, revisions, and release records disagree with the data package, the whole TSO submission is suspect. We recConformity records support for a TSO authorization programA conformity record that cannot be tied to its article and configuration proves nothing. We verify each link and list thInstructions for continued airworthiness support in a TSO programAn ICA that describes a different article than the one approved stalls TSO review. We read each section against the apprFinding and action-item register support for a TSO programFindings closed in status but not in evidence resurface at the worst time: formal review. We split your TSO register intAccomplishment summary support for a TSO authorizationThe accomplishment summary is where a TSO article's objective claims are tested. We screen yours against lifecycle data Compliance matrix support for an STC programYour STC compliance matrix is only as strong as its weakest citation. Get a gap assessment that flags stale evidence andCertification plan support for an STC programA certification plan that undersells scope invites late basis changes. We check proposed basis, affected areas, and commMeans-of-compliance map support for an STC programA means assigned with no evidence path behind it stalls formal review. We trace each STC requirement to a workable meansRequirements traceability support for an STC programDerived and changed requirements are where STC traces quietly break. Get a forward and backward trace assessment that suVerification traceability support for an STC programTest, analysis, or inspection: each STC requirement needs evidence that actually closes it. We assess verification coverDO-160 environmental qualification report support for STCQualified categories that miss the real installation environment come back as findings. We check your DO-160G report agaSTC program DO-178C software lifecycle data supportThe software level sets the bar; your lifecycle data has to clear it. Get every DO-178C objective mapped to supporting eSTC program DO-254 electronic hardware lifecycle data supportElectronic hardware evidence is judged against its design assurance level. We map DO-254 requirements and objectives to STC program safety assessment evidence supportHazards that fail to trace to requirements and verification unravel at review. We check your FHA, PSSA, and SSA line up STC program configuration management data supportIf submitted evidence does not match the controlled baseline, credit evaporates. We assess baselines, revisions, and relSTC program conformity records evidence supportTest data from an unconformed article earns no compliance credit. We tie each test article and installation to a controlSTC program instructions for continued airworthiness supportAn ICA missing tasks, limitations, or parts data stalls STC approval late. We check your instructions for continued airwSTC program finding closure register supportFindings marked closed without evidence reopen at the worst time. We verify each register item has an owner, closure proSTC program accomplishment summary evidence supportReviewers read the accomplishment summary first. We confirm its objective coverage, anomalies, and evidence references mAML STC expansion compliance matrix supportAdding models to an AML STC quietly invalidates old compliance entries. We check that each means and its evidence still AML STC expansion certification plan supportAn AML STC expansion plan makes promises reviewers will hold you to. We review the plan against your actual deliverable Means-of-compliance mapping for an AML STC model-list expansionAdding models to an AML STC? We map every certification basis requirement to its means and evidence, then list the weak Requirements traceability for an AML STC model-list expansionModel list expansions change requirements, and derived ones slip out of the trace. We walk requirement-to-verification lVerification traceability for an AML STC model-list expansionRequirements marked closed with no test, analysis, or inspection stall an AML STC review. We trace every closure to its DO-160G environmental qualification support for an AML STC expansionNew models mean new vibration, temperature, and power environments. We compare your DO-160G categories to each added airDO-178C software lifecycle data support for an AML STC expansionYour PSAC and accomplishment summary must match the software level the expansion carries. We audit DO-178C lifecycle datDO-254 hardware lifecycle data support for an AML STC expansionHardware assurance does not carry over to new models. We check DO-254 plans, design data, and verification against the aSafety assessment support for an AML STC model-list expansionDo your FHA, PSSA, and SSA still hold for the aircraft you are adding? We test each failure condition and classificationConfiguration management review for an AML STC model-list expansionSubmittal packages drift from their baselines quietly. We reconcile revisions and release records for your AML STC expanConformity records review for an AML STC model-list expansionTest results only count if the article conformed. We tie every test article in your AML STC expansion back to a controllInstructions for Continued Airworthiness support for an AML STC expansionEvery model you add needs ICA that actually cover it. We match maintenance tasks, airworthiness limitations, and parts dFinding and action-item register review for an AML STC expansionA finding closed on assertion reopens at the worst moment. We vet your AML STC action item register for owners, evidenceAccomplishment summary review for an AML STC expansionAn accomplishment summary is a set of claims. We chase each one back to lifecycle evidence for your AML STC expansion anCompliance matrix review for a major change programA compliance matrix ages as a major change evolves. We recheck every row for basis coverage, a stated means, and evidencCertification plan review for a major change programCertification plans fail on scope and overreach. We pressure test your major change plan: basis, affected scope, and comMeans-of-compliance map review for a major change programEvery requirement in your major change has an assigned means, but does each means lead to real evidence? Get a gap list Requirements traceability review for a major change programA major change spawns derived and changed requirements, and the ones you miss get found late. We name the missing ones bVerification traceability review for a major change programRequirements marked verified with no test, analysis, or inspection behind them stall a major change review. See where stEnvironmental qualification report review for a major changeA DO-160G report tested to the wrong categories will not cover the installation your major change creates. The gap list Airborne software lifecycle data review for a major changeKnow which DO-178C objectives your major change data misses at the assigned software level. We check plans, standards, aAirborne electronic hardware lifecycle data review for a changeYour DO-254 plans, design data, and verification records must support the assigned DAL. We map where the hardware evidenSafety assessment evidence support for a major changeFHA, PSSA, and SSA results that do not trace to requirements and verification unravel in formal review. Get every hazardConfiguration management evidence support for a major changeIf the evidence you submit describes one configuration and your baselines record another, reviewers notice. We flag everConformity records support for a major changeTest results credited to articles without established conformity can be struck from a major change package. See which ofInstructions for continued airworthiness support for a major changeICA written against an earlier design revision will not match the configuration you actually got approved. We list each Finding and action-item register support for a major changeA finding marked closed without linked evidence reopens at the worst possible moment. We split your major change registeAccomplishment summary support for a major changeAn accomplishment summary that claims objectives the lifecycle data cannot back invites hard questions. We flag each objCompliance matrix support for an installation approvalA compliance matrix with holes in the basis or stale evidence stalls an installation approval. We check coverage and eviCertification plan support for an installation approvalA certification plan that promises coverage your data package cannot deliver delays the approval. We compare it to the bMeans-of-compliance map support for an installation approvalAssigning a means of compliance is the easy half; proving it is where packages come apart. We list each means on your maRequirements traceability support for an installation approvalDerived and changed requirements vanish from installation traces. Get a gap assessment of every broken or missing link bVerification traceability support for installation approval packagesAn unmapped requirement invites findings at installation approval. We build a requirement-to-evidence map covering everyDO-160G environmental qualification report support for installation approvalTest categories that miss the installed location sink DO-160G reports. We check every category and test limit against thDO-178C software lifecycle data support for installation approvalInstallation approval hinges on software data holding at the assigned level. Get an objective-coverage view of DO-178C pDO-254 hardware lifecycle data support for installation approvalDO-254 evidence is measured against the assigned DAL. See where plans, design data, verification, and configuration recoSafety assessment evidence support for installation approvalA hazard that never lands in a requirement leaves the safety loop open. We trace each one through requirement to evidencConfiguration management evidence support for installation approvalEvidence generated on one baseline and submitted against another is revision drift. We reconcile baselines, revisions, aConformity records support for installation approval packagesResults from an unconforming test article may not count as evidence. Get an article-to-test eligibility view covering evInstructions for Continued Airworthiness support for installation approvalAn ICA package that lags the modification comes back with findings. We compare maintenance tasks, limitations, and partsFinding and action-item register support for installation approvalA finding marked closed without proof reopens during review. See ownership, evidence links, and closure state for every Accomplishment summary support for installation approval packagesReviewers pull the thread on every claim in an accomplishment summary. We test each claim against the evidence behind itCompliance matrix support for an ETSO authorizationA matrix row without current evidence is a finding waiting to happen. Get a gap assessment listing every unsupported or Certification plan support for an ETSO authorizationYour certification plan is a promise to EASA. We map it against the invoked ETSO and special conditions, then surface thMeans-of-compliance map support for an ETSO authorizationA means-of-compliance label with no evidence path behind it will not clear review. We flag every requirement whose path Requirements traceability support for an ETSO authorizationAn ETSO trace that drops derived or changed requirements draws findings. We list every requirement missing a design or vVerification traceability support for an ETSO authorizationRequirements claimed met with no evidence behind them stall an ETSO review. We trace test, analysis, and inspection resuDO-160G qualification report support for an ETSO authorizationDO-160G categories the test data does not support sink ETSO reviews. We check limits and installation assumptions againsDO-178C software lifecycle data support for ETSOETSO reviewers work DO-178C data objective by objective. We check plans, standards, and verification records against youDO-254 hardware lifecycle data support for ETSOA DAL assigned on paper but unmet in the data sinks a DO-254 package. We audit plans, design data, and verification befoSafety assessment support for an ETSO authorizationAn FHA classification that never reaches the design leaves your ETSO safety case exposed. We trace FHA, PSSA, and SSA reConfiguration management support for an ETSO authorizationOne artifact outside the controlled baseline can unravel an ETSO submittal. We reconcile baselines, revisions, and releaConformity records support for ETSO authorizationIf your test specimen lacks a controlled standard, the ETSO data behind it is exposed. We check article identity and buiInstructions for continued airworthiness support for ETSO authorizationICA gaps against the authorized configuration mean rework after submittal. We check tasks, limitations, and part coveragFinding and action-item register support for ETSO authorizationFindings marked complete without proof resurface at formal review. We reconcile your ETSO action-item register so every Accomplishment summary support for ETSO authorizationReviewers follow accomplishment summary claims to source. We verify objective coverage, anomaly disclosure, and lifecyclCompliance matrix support for an FAA field approvalStale citations and missed regulations in the compliance matrix stall field approvals. We verify coverage and evidence cCertification plan support for an FAA field approvalA certification plan that commits to data your package cannot produce backfires at review. We check basis, affected areaMeans-of-compliance map support for an FAA field approvalA requirement with no method, or a method that never reaches evidence, invites a finding. We map each compliance path inRequirements traceability support for an FAA field approvalDerived and changed requirements that drop out of the trace surface late in a field approval. We walk requirements to deVerification traceability support for an FAA field approvalMarked verified is not the same as verified. We tie test, analysis, and inspection evidence to each field approval requiDO-160 qualification report support for an FAA field approvalYour DO-160G report was run for one install zone, your field approval covers another. Get the list of categories that miField-approval DO-178C software lifecycle data supportSoftware lifecycle data gets checked against every DO-178C objective at the assigned level, so your field approval packaField-approval DO-254 electronic hardware data supportAirborne electronic hardware in a field approval package: we review plans, design data, and verification against your asField-approval safety assessment evidence supportDoes your safety chain hold from FHA through PSSA to SSA? We trace each assessment to requirements and verification, theField-approval configuration management data supportIf baselines, revisions, and release records point to two different builds, the FAA notices. We confirm your package resField-approval conformity records supportTest data only counts if the article was conformed. We check article identity and test eligibility across your field appField-approval instructions for continued airworthiness supportMaintenance tasks, limitations, and parts data drift from the approved configuration. We reconcile your ICA to the as-apField-approval finding closure register supportItems marked closed with no linked evidence invite findings of their own. We split your field approval register into proField-approval accomplishment summary supportWhen your field approval summary claims more than the lifecycle data shows, review stalls. We tie objective coverage andType-design data package compliance matrix supportEvery requirement in the basis needs a means of compliance and evidence behind it. We audit your type-design matrix for Type-design data package certification plan supportCertification plans that promise evidence the package cannot deliver set up a rough review. We compare your type-design Means-of-compliance map support for a type-design data packageA means-of-compliance map looks complete until someone works each row. We hand it back marked up, with the status of eveRequirements traceability support for a type-design data packageOrphan requirements and links that end nowhere sink a data package. We score your requirement-to-design-to-verification Verification traceability support for a type-design data packageA requirement is not verified because a status column says so. We rate every verified claim against its test, analysis, DO-160 environmental qualification report support for a type-design packageTest limits and categories that assume a different install zone surface late in type-design review. We map DO-160G coverDO-178C software lifecycle data support for a type-design packageSubmitting DO-178C data in a type-design package? Get an objectives-coverage assessment against your assigned software lDO-254 electronic hardware lifecycle data support for a type-design packageReviewers read DO-254 evidence against the assigned DAL. We assess plans, design data, verification, and configuration rSafety assessment support for a type-design data packageSafety results that do not trace to requirements stall a type-design review. We walk the loop from FHA through PSSA to SConfiguration management support for a type-design data packageOne stale revision can undo a type-design submittal. We reconcile baselines, revisions, and release records so the evideConformity records support for a type-design data packageA test on a nonconforming article can void the evidence behind it. We confirm each test article ties to a controlled conInstructions for continued airworthiness support for a type-design packageICA that drift from the approved configuration invite findings. We check tasks, airworthiness limitations, and parts agaFinding and action-item register support for a type-design data packageAn open action item with no owner surfaces at the worst moment. We test each register line for ownership, closure evidenAccomplishment summary support for a type-design data packageYour accomplishment summary asserts objectives are met. We compare each claim with the lifecycle evidence and open problCompliance matrix support for a PMA article approval packageA compliance matrix with stale evidence references stalls FAA review of your PMA article. We surface missing rows and unCertification plan support for a PMA article approval packageEvery line in a PMA certification plan is a promise the FAA will collect on. We check the basis, affected areas, and comMeans-of-compliance map support for a PMA article approval packageAn assigned method with no completed evidence behind it is a finding waiting to happen. We trace each PMA requirement's Requirements traceability support for a PMA article approval packageTrace links between requirements, design, and derived items break quietly. We list every broken, missing, or stale link Verification traceability support for a PMA article approval packageEvery requirement marked complete needs evidence: test, analysis, inspection, or review. We call out the ones in your PMEnvironmental qualification report support for a PMA article approval packageYour DO-160 report must cover the installation, not just the bench. We flag test categories, limits, and assumptions thaAirborne software lifecycle data support for a PMA article approval packagePMA reviewers test DO-178C data against the assigned software level. We audit plans, standards, verification records, anAirborne electronic hardware lifecycle data support for a PMA article packageDO-254 data can stall a PMA package late. We check plans, design data, verification, and configuration against the assigSafety assessment evidence support for a PMA article approvalFHA, PSSA, and SSA results get read hard in a PMA package. We trace your safety evidence to requirements and score each Configuration management data support for a PMA article approvalBaselines, revisions, and release records that do not match the submitted configuration sink PMA reviews. We reconcile yConformity records support for a PMA article approvalPMA test results only count if conformity holds. We tie specimen identity, configuration, and eligibility to controlled Instructions for continued airworthiness support for a PMA articleAn ICA written against an older revision invites findings. We check tasks, limitations, and part data against the approvFinding closure register support for a PMA article approvalA finding marked closed without proof reopens later. We audit your PMA register's ownership, evidence links, and closureAccomplishment summary support for a PMA article approvalReviewers read a PMA accomplishment summary first. We check its claims against your DO-178C and DO-254 data and list eac
Evidence & deliverables
Certification evidence sets, what they must show, and how they are reviewed.
Certification compliance matrix reviewA matrix entry without live evidence is a finding in waiting. We check every requirement against its means of compliancePlan for Software Aspects of Certification (PSAC) reviewA weak PSAC sets up months of rework. We check your plan against the DO-178C objectives for your software level, lifecycSoftware Accomplishment Summary (SAS) reviewThe SAS must report what the program did, not what the PSAC promised. We check every claim against the DO-178C objectiveHardware Accomplishment Summary (HAS) reviewAt DO-254 closure the HAS has to reconcile with the PHAC. We check your hardware program claims against the evidence andStructural-coverage evidence review for airborne softwareCoverage gaps can stall verification closure. We check MC/DC, decision, and statement results against your DO-178C levelRequirements-based test evidence review for airborne softwareUntraced tests or robustness gaps weaken a DO-178C verdict. We review requirements-based test cases and results, then coDerived-requirements review for systems and softwareDerived requirements that skip the safety assessment can bypass hazards. We check that each is identified, justified, anSafety program plan review for new development program kickoffPlan review for OEMs and avionics suppliers. EE checks safety activity timing, supplier inputs, and update triggers befoDO-254 SOI-4 final hardware review prep for hardware soi-4 audit scheduledReview do-254 soi-4 final hardware review prep evidence, flag unsupported claims, and receive an exception register for Security risk assessment effectiveness review for airworthiness security evidence reviewSecurity risk assessment effectiveness review for avionics suppliers and OEMs. EE checks source evidence, flags discrepaCrash safety inertia load substantiation review for installation load substantiationCrash safety inertia load substantiation review for OEMs and MROs. EE checks source evidence, flags discrepancies, and dOpen item review for final certification problem reportsReview open problem reports for certification teams. EE checks dispositions, summaries, workarounds, and deferred fix evDO-254 Appendix B advanced verification review for dal a/b hardware verification planningReview do-254 appendix b advanced verification review evidence, flag unsupported claims, and receive an exception registPDI verification evidence for post-baseline data changesReview PDI definitions, verification results, and release controls so configuration data changes do not invalidate softwSingle event effects analysis review for see finding or issue paper raisedSingle event effects analysis review for avionics suppliers and equipment suppliers. EE checks source evidence, flags diETSO and TSO evidence reuse review for easa validation of a tso articleETSO and TSO evidence reuse review for equipment suppliers and avionics suppliers. EE checks source evidence, flags discDO-178C SOI-3 verification review prep for soi-3 audit scheduledDO-178C SOI-3 verification review prep for avionics suppliers and Engineering teams. EE checks source evidence, flags diDO-254 SOI-2 hardware design review prep for hardware soi-2 audit scheduledReview do-254 soi-2 hardware design review prep evidence, flag unsupported claims, and receive an exception register forSystem safety assessment review for ssa closure before type or stc approvalSystem safety assessment review for OEMs and avionics suppliers. EE checks source evidence, flags discrepancies, and delService experience substantiation review for service-history credit decisionService experience substantiation review for equipment suppliers and OEMs. EE checks source evidence, flags discrepancieDO-254 SOI-3 hardware verification review prep for hardware soi-3 audit scheduledReview do-254 soi-3 hardware verification review prep evidence, flag unsupported claims, and receive an exception registCabin material flammability substantiation review for cabin interior compliance reviewCabin material flammability substantiation review for MROs and OEMs. EE checks source evidence, flags discrepancies, andEngine part PMA material conformity review for engine-part pma data reviewEngine part PMA material conformity review for PMA suppliers and MROs. EE checks source evidence, flags discrepancies, aEnvironmental qualification test plan review for qualification test planningReview environmental qualification test plan review evidence, flag unsupported claims, and receive an exception registerPSecAC scope and consistency review for security special condition or cri on the basisPSecAC scope and consistency review for avionics suppliers and OEMs. EE checks source evidence, flags discrepancies, andIMA module acceptance data review for ima integration milestoneIMA module acceptance data review for avionics suppliers and OEMs. EE checks source evidence, flags discrepancies, and dData and control coupling analysis evidence review for DO-178CChecking data and control coupling analysis? EE reviews interface against DO-178C and returns gaps and closure actions.Hardware configuration index evidence review for DO-254Before submittal, EE tests hardware configuration index records against DO-254 and identifies missing support before revFunctional hazard assessment evidence review for ARP4761A, ARP4754BFor functional hazard assessment, EE maps function list against the system to the claim and flags configuration, rationaDO-178C Level A evidence evidence review for DO-178CPreparing evidence? EE reviews the DO-178C Level A evidence package and returns an evidence map, exception list, and cloPreliminary system safety assessment evidence review for ARP4761A, ARP4754BChecking preliminary system safety assessment? EE checks the package against ARP4761A, ARP4754B and returns gaps, links,Security risk assessment evidence review for DO-326A, DO-356ABefore submittal, EE tests security risk assessment records against DO-326A, DO-356A and identifies missing support befoTool qualification plan scoping evidence review for DO-178CFor tool qualification plan scoping, EE maps list of tools requiring qualification to the claim and flags configuration,DO-254 SOI-1 hardware planning evidence review for DO-254Preparing evidence? EE reviews the DO-254 SOI-1 hardware planning package and returns an evidence map, exception list, aRequirements validation evidence evidence review for ARP4754BChecking requirements validation evidence? EE reviews validation plan against ARP4754B and returns gaps and closure actiDO-178C SOI-2 development data evidence review for DO-178CBefore submittal, EE tests DO-178C SOI-2 development data records against DO-178C and identifies missing support before Qualification by analysis substantiation evidence review for DO-160GFor qualification by analysis substantiation, EE maps analysis method to the claim and flags configuration, rationale, aCommon cause analysis evidence review for ARP4761APreparing evidence? EE reviews the common cause analysis package and returns an evidence map, exception list, and closurIssue paper and CRI response evidence evidence review for the agreed certification basisChecking issue paper and CRI response evidence? EE reviews issue paper or CRI position against the agreed certification DO-160 category selection audit evidence review for DO-160GBefore submittal, EE tests DO-160 category selection audit records against DO-160G and identifies missing support beforeAeronautical data integrity chain evidence review for the agreed certification basisFor aeronautical data integrity chain, EE maps dQRs per data element to the claim and flags configuration, rationale, anEMI/EMC test report evidence review for DO-160GPreparing evidence? EE reviews the EMI/EMC test report package and returns an evidence map, exception list, and closure Software service history credit evidence review for DO-178CChecking software service history credit? EE reviews service period definition against DO-178C and returns gaps and closPHAC evidence review for DO-254Before submittal, EE tests PHAC records against DO-254 and identifies missing support before review.Previously developed software reuse evidence review for DO-178CFor previously developed software reuse, EE maps original approval evidence to the claim and flags configuration, rationField-loadable software evidence evidence review for DO-178CPreparing evidence? EE reviews the field-loadable software evidence package and returns an evidence map, exception list,Tool classification and TQL determination evidence review for DO-330, DO-178CChecking tool classification and TQL determination? EE reviews tool list with claimed credit per tool against DO-330, DOQualification by similarity justification evidence review for DO-160GBefore submittal, EE tests qualification by similarity justification records against DO-160G and identifies missing suppSystem development plan evidence review for ARP4754BFor system development plan, EE maps lifecycle definition to the claim and flags configuration, rationale, and source-reTransponder and ADS-B register verification evidence review for DO-178CPreparing evidence? EE reviews the transponder and ADS-B register verification package and returns an evidence map, exceSoftware configuration index evidence review for DO-178CChecking software configuration index? EE reviews sCI contents against released source against DO-178C and returns gaps Partitioning isolation analysis evidence review for DO-178C, DO-297Before submittal, EE tests partitioning isolation analysis records against DO-178C, DO-297 and identifies missing supporDO-178C SOI-4 final package evidence review for DO-178CFor DO-178C SOI-4 final package, EE maps software Accomplishment Summary claim by claim to the claim and flags configuraDO-178C SOI-1 planning package evidence review for DO-178C, DO-330Preparing evidence? EE reviews the DO-178C SOI-1 planning package package and returns an evidence map, exception list, aEnvironmental qualification evidence review for airborne equipmentDoes your DO-160G evidence match the declared installation environment? Get a section-by-section coverage view, each catAirborne software lifecycle evidence review under DO-178CLifecycle data that does not match the assigned software level fails audits. We map your evidence to every DO-178C objecAirborne electronic hardware evidence review under DO-254Complex devices draw harder scrutiny under DO-254. We check hardware lifecycle data against the assigned design assurancSystems-development evidence review under ARP4754BARP4754B asks whether item definition, requirements, and validation hold together at the assigned DAL. We check the chaiSafety-assessment evidence review under ARP4761AOne misaligned failure-condition classification can unwind derived requirements downstream. We check FHA, PSSA, and SSA Requirements-traceability review for certification evidenceOrphaned and unparented requirements surface at the worst time: in front of the authority. We check the bidirectional trVerification-traceability review for certification evidenceA requirement without current verification evidence is an open finding. We trace each one to its method and result and fConfiguration-management evidence review for avionics and equipment suppliersIf your baselines cannot name the exact build the certification data describes, submittal stalls. Get a reconciled confiQuality-assurance records review for avionics and equipment suppliersAuditors do not take process compliance on faith. We review audit results, process records, and corrective actions to shTool-qualification evidence review for avionics and equipment suppliersTool credit without qualification at the right level is a finding waiting to happen. Get a tool register: claimed creditCompliance-checklist review for avionics and equipment suppliersA checklist of green statuses means little if the evidence behind them is thin. We verify every objective and return youIndependent certification-plan review for avionics and equipment suppliersYour plan commits the basis, standards, and assurance levels. Get an independent read of the PSAC before the authority sAccomplishment-summary review for avionics and equipment suppliersYour SAS or HAS says the program is done. We check it against the plan it answers and the evidence you actually hold, soQualification-test-report review for avionics and equipment suppliersA DO-160 report that skips a category or drifts from the test plan stalls the submittal. We check coverage and traceabilCompliance-matrix review when one matrix carries both an FAA and an EASA basisOne matrix, two authorities. We read your FAA and EASA columns for method adequacy and alignment, and return an annotateConformity-records review for the articles a certification test relied onA test report is only as strong as the article behind it. Get a record-by-record verdict on each conformity inspection rICA package review for the instructions an installed article must carryMissing limitations or untraceable tasks surface in service, where they cost most. Get each ICA section checked for compFinding and action-item register review before a program closes its open itemsItems closed without real evidence reopen at audit. We reconcile your finding and action-item register: each closure conCompliance matrix evidence review for avionics suppliersAn avionics compliance matrix with stale evidence fails quietly. We review coverage, means of compliance, and currency bCertification plan evidence review for avionics suppliersAn avionics certification plan that promises data the package lacks draws findings. We compare basis, affected areas, anMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for avionics suppliersA method on paper is not evidence in hand. We walk your means-of-compliance map requirement by requirement and list everRequirements trace evidence review for avionics suppliersA requirements trace with broken links stalls avionics reviews. We follow each requirement through design and verificatiVerification traceability evidence review for avionics suppliersA verified mark is worth only the evidence behind it. We audit your avionics verification traceability and name every reDO-160 qualification report evidence review for avionics suppliersDO-160 test levels that miss the installation environment surface late. We check every tested category, section, and assDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence review for avionics suppliersDO-178C objectives slip when independence runs thin. We review your lifecycle data against the assigned software level aDO-254 hardware lifecycle data evidence review for avionics suppliersIs your DO-254 hardware evidence complete at the assigned DAL? We audit your lifecycle data and name each gap: missing, Safety assessment evidence review for avionics suppliersFHA, PSSA, and SSA must reconcile and trace into requirements. We review avionics safety evidence and name each break beConfiguration management data evidence review for avionics suppliersSubmitted evidence that disagrees with your baselines draws findings. We reconcile avionics release records and indexes,Conformity records evidence review for avionics suppliersA test result is only as good as the article behind it. We check avionics conformity records for identity and eligibilitInstructions for continued airworthiness evidence review for avionics suppliersAvionics design changes outpace manuals fast. We compare your ICA tasks, limitations, and part numbers to the approved cCompliance matrix evidence review for equipment suppliersOne stale citation can undo a compliance claim. We review your equipment compliance matrix for basis coverage and evidenCertification plan evidence review for equipment suppliersCertification plans age faster than programs admit. We check your equipment plan's basis, scope, and commitments againstMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for equipment suppliersA method with no artifact behind it is a promise, not compliance. We trace your means-of-compliance map to real evidenceRequirements traceability evidence review for equipment suppliersTraceability looks complete until someone pulls a thread. We follow each equipment requirement to design and verificatioVerification traceability evidence review for equipment suppliersRequirements marked complete without test, analysis, or inspection evidence fail review. We check the proof behind everyDO-160 qualification report evidence review for equipment suppliersA DO-160 report at the wrong category leaves your installation exposed. We map test levels to the intended environment aDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence review for equipment suppliersDoes your lifecycle data back the accomplishment summary? We audit plans and verification records against the assigned lDO-254 hardware lifecycle data evidence review for equipment suppliersDAL shortfalls hide in hardware data until the audit. We review DO-254 plans, design data, and verification for your FPGSafety assessment evidence review for equipment suppliersFHA, PSSA, and SSA drift apart over a long program. We cross-check your equipment safety set for classification conflictConfiguration management data evidence review for equipment suppliersTest data from one baseline, submittal from another: reviewers notice. We audit equipment configuration records against Conformity records evidence review for equipment suppliersWas each test article conformed and eligible when it ran? We audit equipment conformity records and list every result thInstructions for continued airworthiness evidence review for equipment suppliersEquipment supplier ICAs drift as the approved configuration moves. We check tasks, limitations, and parts data for coverCompliance matrix evidence review for aircraft modifiersYour STC compliance matrix was true the day you wrote it. We reread each row against its cited evidence and flag unsuppoCertification plan evidence review for aircraft modifiersYour certification plan promises a basis, affected areas, and compliance data. We test each commitment against the packaMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for aircraft modifiersA method assigned is not evidence delivered. We walk your means-of-compliance map and flag each requirement whose evidenRequirements traceability evidence review for aircraft modifiersDerived and changed requirements drop out of the chain quietly. We trace your set down to design and up to verification,Verification traceability evidence review for aircraft modifiersMarked complete is not closed. We check each requirement against its test, analysis, inspection, or review results and fDO-160 qualification report evidence review for modifiersDO-160 results prove the categories you ran, not the installation you fly. We check tested categories, limits, and setupDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence review for modifiersWe read your DO-178C plans, verification records, and accomplishment summary against the assigned software level, then kDO-254 hardware lifecycle data evidence review for modifiersDO-254 data has to hold at the assigned DAL, not one level down. We review plans, design data, verification, and configuSafety assessment evidence review for aircraft modifiersYour FHA, PSSA, and SSA must close back to requirements and the verification that meets them. We trace each hazard throuConfiguration management evidence review for aircraft modifiersEvidence that disagrees with the controlled baseline stalls a review. We check your configuration records and list each Conformity records evidence review for aircraft modifiersOne untraceable test article can undo a clean campaign. We review your conformity records and flag each article or instaInstructions for continued airworthiness evidence review for modifiersAn STC's ICA has to match the approved modification, not the drawing set you started from. We compare instructions, limiCompliance matrix evidence review for certification teamsBasis items lose their evidence as the design moves. We audit your team's compliance matrix and flag every row where theCertification plan evidence review for certification teamsYou sign the plan; the data package has to keep it. We check every commitment against what the package holds today and fMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for certification teamsYour means-of-compliance map says everything is covered. Before submittal, we verify each assigned means resolves to reaRequirements traceability evidence review for certification teamsOrphaned requirements surface at the worst time: in front of the authority. Get a gap list of every broken, missing, or Verification traceability evidence review for certification teamsA requirement marked complete with no result behind it is a finding waiting to happen. We check every closure and flag eDO-160 qualification report evidence review for certification teamsYour DO-160 report gets read against the claimed categories and the installation. We check the evidence chain the way a DO-178C software data evidence review for certification teamsLifecycle data that misses the assigned software level stalls a submittal. Get a gap list of each DO-178C objective yourDO-254 hardware data evidence review for certification teamsYour DO-254 package must hold up at the assigned DAL. We review plans, design data, and verification records and name eaSafety-assessment evidence review for certification teamsFHA, PSSA, and SSA results that do not trace to requirements and verification weaken the case. Get a gap list naming eacConfiguration management evidence review for certification teamsSubmitted evidence that does not match the controlled baseline invites findings. We check baselines, revisions, and releConformity-records evidence review for certification teamsA test on an unconformed article can be a test you run twice. We check article identity and build conformity and flag eaICA package evidence review for certification teamsAn ICA package that lags the approved design fails review on arrival. We reconcile maintenance tasks, limitations, and pCompliance-matrix evidence review for software assurance teamsA compliance matrix citing evidence that moved or changed sinks a software submittal. We verify each entry is live and lCertification-plan evidence review for software assurance teamsA PSAC promising coverage your data cannot deliver sets up findings. We check basis, affected areas, and commitments andMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for software assurance teamsEvery requirement with an assigned means needs a route to real evidence. We walk your software compliance map end to endRequirements-trace evidence review for software assurance teamsDO-178C reviewers pull the trace both ways. We audit requirement, design, and verification links and report each break aVerification-trace evidence review for software assurance teamsVerified means proven. We check test, analysis, inspection, or review evidence behind each verified requirement and flagDO-160 qualification report evidence review for software assurance teamsA DO-160G report can pass every test and still miss your installation. We check categories and limits and hand your softDO-178C software data evidence review for software assurance teamsBefore lifecycle data reaches the authority: an independent read of plans, verification records, and the accomplishment DO-254 hardware data evidence review for software assurance teamsYour DO-254 package: plans, design data, verification, and configuration records checked against the assigned DAL, each Safety assessment evidence review for software assurance teamsFHA, PSSA, and SSA read against ARP4761A: we trace safety results to requirements and flag every failure condition that Configuration management evidence review for software assurance teamsIf your evidence describes one configuration and your baselines another, review stalls. We check release records and flaConformity records evidence review for software assurance teamsConformity records hold when test article identity, configuration, and eligibility align. We flag articles not tied to aICA package evidence review for software assurance teamsICA that drifts from the approved configuration surfaces late. We check maintenance tasks, limitations, and parts data aCompliance matrix evidence review for hardware assurance teamsA compliance matrix ages quietly: evidence gets superseded, claims stand. We check each entry's means of compliance and Certification plan evidence review for hardware assurance teamsYour certification plan made commitments; your data package may not keep them. We compare basis and commitments against Means-of-compliance map evidence review for hardware teamsA means of compliance without an evidence path is a finding in waiting. We walk your requirement-to-evidence logic and nRequirements traceability evidence review for hardware teamsDerived and changed requirements are where traceability breaks. We check requirements against design and verification anVerification traceability evidence review for hardware assurance teamsMarked verified is not the same as evidenced. We trace closed requirements to test, analysis, inspection, or review recoDO-160 qualification report evidence review for hardware assurance teamsThe report passed; the question is whether DO-160 categories match where the equipment will fly. We check limits and insDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence reviewDoes the accomplishment summary claim more than the evidence shows? We check DO-178C plans and verification records agaiDO-254 hardware data evidence review for hardware assurance teamsBefore a submittal or design-change assessment: DO-254 plans, design data, and verification checked against your DAL, gaSafety assessment evidence review for hardware assurance teamsFHA, PSSA, and SSA results that trace to nothing stall submittals. We walk your safety chain to requirements and verificConfiguration management evidence review for hardware assurance teamsIf reviewers cannot tie your evidence to a baseline, findings follow. We check revisions and release records, then list Conformity records evidence review for hardware assurance teamsResults claimed on articles nobody can prove were conforming get challenged. We tie each article and installation to itsICA package evidence review for hardware assurance teamsAn ICA missing tasks, limitations, or parts data for the approved configuration stalls approval. Get the list of what yoCompliance matrix evidence review for qualification test teamsA matrix entry citing superseded evidence is coverage on paper only. We check every certification basis item and its citCertification plan evidence review for qualification test teamsPlan commitments your data package cannot meet surface at the worst moment. We reconcile plan against deliverables and kMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for qualification test teamsA declared means with no evidence behind it is a finding in waiting. We walk your MoC map requirement by requirement andRequirements traceability review for qualification test teamsOrphaned and broken trace links surface during audit, not before. We align requirements, design, and verification for yoVerification traceability review for qualification test teamsRequirements marked verified without current evidence unravel under review. We audit test, analysis, and inspection closDO-160 qualification report evidence review for qualification test teamsA DO-160G category that does not cover the installation invalidates the result. We compare test limits and categories toDO-178C software data evidence review for qualification test teamsObjectives owed at your software level are not optional. We review plans, verification records, and the SAS against the DO-254 hardware data evidence review for qualification test teamsDO-254 findings start where assurance runs thin at the assigned DAL. We review hardware plans, design data, and verificaSafety assessment evidence review for qualification test teamsSafety conclusions no requirement supports are the orphans reviewers hunt. We trace FHA, PSSA, and SSA output for your qConfiguration management evidence review for qualification test teamsEvidence credited to a superseded revision fails the baseline check. We reconcile your submitted data against the controConformity records evidence review for qualification test teamsA test result resting on a non-conforming article is one you cannot use. We verify each article traces to a controlled cICA package evidence review for qualification test teamsTest configurations outrun manuals. We check ICA tasks, limitations, and parts data against the approved configuration aCompliance matrix evidence review for quality teamsEvery matrix row claims a finding. We verify each claim still resolves to evidence and flag the rows that are missing, sCertification plan evidence review for quality teamsYour certification plan makes promises the data package must keep. We name each commitment the evidence cannot yet meet Means-of-compliance map evidence review for quality teamsA means-of-compliance map fails quietly: methods assigned with no evidence path. We check every requirement and name theRequirements traceability evidence review for quality teamsDerived and changed requirements are where traceability breaks. We audit your trace across design and verification and nVerification traceability evidence review for quality teamsMarked verified is not the same as proven. We check every closed requirement for real test, analysis, or review evidenceDO-160 qualification report evidence review for quality teamsA DO-160 report can pass every test and still miss the installation. We compare tested categories to the real environmenDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence review for quality teamsA software level is a bar, not a grade. We read your DO-178C plans, verification data, and accomplishment summary and naDO-254 hardware lifecycle data evidence review for quality teamsDO-254 findings land where hardware evidence runs thin. We review plans, design data, and verification against the assigSafety assessment evidence review for quality teamsFHA, PSSA, and SSA results that never close to a requirement draw findings. We trace your safety assessment to requiremeConfiguration management data evidence review for quality teamsData that drifted from the released baseline is a finding waiting to happen. We check every artifact revision against thConformity records evidence review for quality teamsIf a test article cannot trace to a controlled build, its results are arguable. We review your conformity records and naICA package evidence review for quality teamsBefore quality signs the ICA package, be sure tasks, limitations, and parts data track the approved configuration. We de
Standards
The standards behind certification evidence and how compliance is demonstrated.
Part 33 engine certification data supportCertification stalls when the claimed Part 33 basis and your substantiation disagree. Get a requirement-by-requirement gMOPS compliance support for airborne equipmentBefore your TSO package goes in, know which MOPS requirements your performance evidence actually answers. We map each reEnvironmental category mapping for airborne equipmentThe installation environment, not a default table, sets your DO-160 categories. We derive the category set and check youSoftware level objective mapping under DO-178CDoes your DO-178C objective set match the assigned level? We reconcile objectives, independence, and lifecycle data, theHardware design-assurance level mapping under DO-254Complex hardware with vague DAL assignments invites findings. We tie each item to its DO-254 level from the failure clasDevelopment-assurance level allocation under ARP4754BUnjustified DAL reductions unravel in review. We trace each DAL from failure condition through function to item under ARBilateral standards-acceptance mapping for exportBilateral agreements do not accept everything. We map the standard deltas and the importing authority's special requiremConsensus-standard compliance support for accepted standardsAuthorities that accept consensus standards still expect evidence behind every clause. We line up each invoked standard FAA-EASA TIP validation for building the data package the validating authority acceptsPlanning faa easa tip validation data? EE reviews design approval records, configuration limits, and missing support, thDO-160 Section 22 support for waveform sets matched to zones and wiringPlanning do-160 section 22 lightning transients? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, DO-160 Section 17 support for voltage-spike category selection for power inputsPlanning do-160 section 17 voltage spike? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then reDO-160 Section 19 support for induced-signal susceptibility for interconnected equipmentPlanning do-160 section 19 induced signal? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then rDO-160 Section 23 support for lightning direct-effects for externally mounted equipmentPlanning do-160 section 23 lightning direct effects? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing suppoSTC ownership under 21.47 for rights, permission letters, and the records that prove themPlanning stc transfer 21 47 rights and? EE reviews certification records, configuration limits, and missing support, theDO-160 Section 16 support for power input categories that bound the aircraftPlanning do-160 section 16 power input? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then retuAC 20-152A scope support for which hardware now needs DO-254 evidencePlanning ac 20 152a do-254 scope? EE reviews certification records, configuration limits, and missing support, then retuDO-297 support for IMA roles and objectives mapped across three partiesPlanning do-297 ima development? EE reviews lifecycle data, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns a reARP4754A to ARP4754B transition review for what the B revision changes for your programPlanning arp4754a to arp4754b transition review? EE reviews safety assessments, configuration limits, and missing supporUK CAA validation of FAA and EASA approvals for the post-Brexit evidence pathPlanning uk caa stc validation? EE reviews design approval records, configuration limits, and missing support, then retuDO-200B aeronautical data for data quality requirements and the processing chainPlanning do 200b data quality requirements? EE reviews lifecycle data, configuration limits, and missing support, then rDO-160 Section 20 support for RF susceptibility levels that match the HIRF casePlanning do-160 section 20 rf susceptibility? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, theCS-STAN standard changes for light-touch mods that still need defensible recordsPlanning cs-stan standard changes? EE reviews design approval records, configuration limits, and missing support, then rDO-333 support for formal analysis credit with a defensible soundness casePlanning do-333 formal methods? EE reviews lifecycle data, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns a recARP5150/5151 in-service safety for closing the loop from field data to safety assessmentPlanning arp5150 5151 in service safety assessment? EE reviews safety assessments, configuration limits, and missing supDO-332 support for object-oriented vulnerabilities answered, not ignoredPlanning do-332 object oriented technology? EE reviews lifecycle data, configuration limits, and missing support, then rPart 21 Subpart L for how export airworthiness approvals actually workPlanning part 21 subpart l export approvals? EE reviews export approval records, configuration limits, and missing suppoDO-356A security methods for threat conditions, security measures, and effectiveness evidencePlanning do-356a airworthiness security methods? EE reviews security analyses, configuration limits, and missing supportDO-160F to DO-160G delta review for equipment suppliersDO-160F to DO-160G delta review for equipment suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure DO-178B to DO-178C transition review for avionics suppliersDO-178B to DO-178C transition review for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closMulti-core processor evidence review for avionics suppliersMulti-core processor evidence review for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closDO-160 Section 21 emissions support for equipment suppliersDO-160 Section 21 emissions support for equipment suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closReview of STC ICA availability review for operatorsSTC ICA availability review for operators, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure package for thDO-160 Section 8 vibration support for equipment suppliersDO-160 Section 8 vibration support for equipment suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closuDO-331 model-based development support for avionics suppliersDO-331 model-based development support for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a clDO-330 TQL determination support for avionics suppliersDO-330 TQL determination support for avionics suppliers, with source-record checks, discrepancy findings, and a closure DO-178C software compliance support for airborne softwareYour lifecycle data faces every DO-178C objective at its software level. We map the gaps before review, so plans, coveraDO-254 hardware compliance support for airborne electronic hardwareComplex hardware draws hard questions: does the PHAC match the evidence? We assess your DO-254 design assurance gaps agaDO-160G environmental qualification support for airborne equipmentWrong categories turn DO-160G qualification into rework. We check your selections, test plan, and reports against the inARP4754B development-assurance support at the system levelDAL assignment, requirements validation, and the tie to software and hardware assurance all get read hard. We map your AARP4761A safety-assessment support for airborne systemsA safety case that breaks between FHA, PSSA, and SSA takes the DAL assignment with it. We check the chain and the FTA anDO-326A airworthiness-security support for airborne systemsSecurity risk assessment, threat scenarios, measures evidence: all face the DO-326A process. Get a gap assessment showinDO-330 tool-qualification support for development and verification toolsCertification credit on an unqualified tool is a finding waiting to happen. We assess your DO-330 evidence against the aDO-200B aeronautical-data quality support for equipment suppliersA data submission needs a traceable chain: quality requirements assigned, process specified, integrity shown. We help buTSO compliance support for avionics and equipment suppliersYour article must meet the minimum performance standard its TSO invokes. Get a gap assessment across the qualification eETSO compliance support and TSO-to-ETSO mapping for suppliersTaking a TSO article into an EASA authorisation? We reconcile CS-ETSO differences and build the difference map and declaPart 23 certification-basis support for equipment on normal-category aircraftInstalling equipment on a normal-category airplane? We fix the Part 23 amendment, pick consensus standards as your meansPart 25 certification-basis support for equipment on transport-category airplanesTransport-category equipment carries special conditions and failure-condition classes. We pin the Part 25 amendment and Part 27 certification-basis support for equipment on normal-category rotorcraftNormal-category rotorcraft bring vibration and HIRF demands fixed-wing gear never sees. Your Part 27 basis map and meansPart 29 certification-basis support for equipment on transport-category rotorcraftCategory A provisions drive everything on transport-category rotorcraft. Get a Part 29 basis map, fixed to its amendmentDO-178C software compliance support for flight-deck equipmentFlight-deck software draws close scrutiny. We map each DO-178C objective to the evidence that satisfies it, installationDO-178C software compliance support for navigation equipmentNavigation software adds MOPS, sensor inputs, and database currency to the DO-178C workload. We build the objective-by-oDO-178C software compliance support for surveillance equipmentTransponder or ADS-B software heading into a submittal? We map each DO-178C objective to its evidence and tie it to instDO-178C software compliance support for communication equipmentRadio software evidence rarely stands alone: antenna, electrical load, and environmental data must agree with it. Our DODO-178C software compliance support for a display systemDisplay software data is read against human-factors assumptions and DO-160G qualification. We reconcile all three into oDO-178C software compliance support for a sensor systemSensor software claims only hold when calibration and installation effects back them up. Get a DO-178C map pairing each DO-254 hardware compliance support for flight-deck equipmentFlight-deck hardware draws DAL questions the moment a reviewer opens the file. We place your AEH assurance data against DO-254 hardware compliance support for navigation equipmentNavigation hardware evidence must line up with sensor interfaces, database handling, and MOPS. Our DO-254 map shows wherDO-254 hardware assurance evidence support for surveillance equipmentTransponder or ADS-B evidence is judged against the plan and its DAL. We key each DO-254 objective to its proof and handDO-254 hardware assurance evidence support for communication equipmentA radio's DO-254 file stands or falls on its requirements trace and assigned DAL. We check both, map every objective to DO-254 hardware assurance evidence support for display systemsDisplay units blur the DO-254 and DO-178C boundary, right where reviewers probe. Our map ties each hardware objective toDO-254 hardware assurance evidence support for sensor systemsSensor hardware evidence must tie requirements, calibration, and verification to its DAL. Get a DO-254 map with every gaDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for flight-deck equipmentA flight-deck unit qualified to the wrong DO-160G categories fails installation review. We tie each declared category toDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for navigation equipmentNavigation units draw hard questions on HIRF and lightning sections. We match each DO-160G category you declare to its tDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for surveillance equipmentTransponder and ADS-B qualification must match the installation and antenna. We reconcile each DO-160G category to its tDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for communication equipmentRadio DO-160G qualification turns on details: power input, voltage spikes, audio susceptibility. We pair each category wDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for display systemsDisplay units answer for the crew environment: thermal, humidity, sand and dust. We map each category to its DO-160G secDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for sensor systemsVibration, fluids, icing: confirm the sensor unit's DO-160G qualification matches its exposed install. Get a category-byARP4754B development assurance evidence review for flight-deck equipmentFlight-deck equipment draws hard questions on requirement flow. We map every ARP4754B objective to the evidence that ansARP4754B development assurance evidence review for navigation equipmentSensor inputs, database currency, software trace: an ARP4754B review lining each objective up with your navigation evideARP4754B development assurance evidence review for surveillance equipmentTransponder and ADS-B packages stall on requirement trace, not test data. We connect each ARP4754B objective to your surARP4754B development assurance evidence review for communication equipmentRadio performance, antenna, and electrical-load requirements all have to trace. An ARP4754B map ties each objective to yARP4754B development assurance evidence review for display systemsSoftware lifecycle data and human-factors assumptions get probed first on displays. We place each ARP4754B objective agaARP4754B development assurance evidence review for sensor systemsCalibration evidence, installation effects, requirement trace: a review tying every ARP4754B objective to your sensor evARP4761A safety assessment evidence review for flight-deck equipmentHazard classification and failure analysis on flight-deck equipment get read closely. We map each ARP4761A objective to ARP4761A safety assessment evidence review for navigation equipmentMisleading-information hazards sink navigation submittals. Check failure analysis and requirement trace against every ARARP4761A safety assessment evidence review for surveillance equipmentTransponder and ADS-B hazard classifications face scrutiny. An ARP4761A map ties each objective to your surveillance eviARP4761A safety assessment evidence review for communication equipmentLoss-of-communication hazards need classification, failure analysis, and trace that agree. We map ARP4761A objectives toARP4761A safety-assessment evidence support for display systemsFDAL allocation, failure conditions, software lifecycle links: check your display system's safety evidence against each ARP4761A safety-assessment evidence support for sensor systemsErroneous output decides a sensor's safety argument. Map calibration trace and installation effects to each ARP4761A objDO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for flight-deck equipmentData loading interfaces can put flight-deck equipment inside the aircraft security perimeter. Map threat conditions and DO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for navigation equipmentNavigation database updates are a security chain. We map update integrity and position-data threats to each DO-326A objeDO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for surveillance equipmentTransponder and ADS-B evidence gets probed on the RF and datalink attack surface. We map your artifacts to each DO-326A DO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for communication equipmentDatalink, voice, and connectivity widen a comm unit's attack surface. Get a DO-326A evidence map showing which threat coDO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for display systemsA spoofed symbol reaching the crew is the threat reviewers press on. We map your display's DO-326A evidence to the data DO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for sensor systemsMaintenance access and calibration tampering top the DO-326A threat list for sensors. Our evidence map ties each objectiTSO compliance evidence support for flight-deck equipmentFlight-deck TSO packages stumble on the article versus installation boundary. We map your evidence to the minimum perforTSO compliance evidence support for navigation equipmentFunctional class, accuracy, and the software level behind them: your navigation TSO evidence must line up. We map each cTSO compliance evidence support for surveillance equipmentA finding on a transponder or ADS-B article stalls the authorization. Our TSO evidence map links every surveillance claiTSO compliance evidence support for communication equipmentRadio TSO packages fail when performance, antenna, or electrical load claims point at no report. We tie each claim to DOTSO compliance evidence support for display systemsDisplay TSO submittals turn on DO-178C data and human-factors assumptions holding together. We map both to your qualificTSO compliance evidence support for sensor systemsSensor TSO evidence spans requirements trace, calibration, and installation effects. Our map ties each accuracy claim toETSO compliance evidence support for flight-deck equipmentEuropean authorization arranges evidence differently than your TSO file. We restructure flight-deck evidence, human inteETSO compliance evidence support for navigation equipmentMOPS alignment, database currency, software level: your navigation ETSO file is checked on all three. We map each claim ETSO compliance evidence support for surveillance equipmentTransponder, ADS-B, and antenna substantiation must fit the European structure, not mirror a TSO file. Get an ETSO evideETSO compliance evidence support for communication equipmentA radio ETSO file covers performance, antenna, electrical load, and DO-160G qualification. We align each claim to its evETSO compliance evidence support for display systemsDisplay ETSO reviews weigh DO-178C software data against human-factors assumptions. We arrange both for the European strETSO compliance evidence support for sensor systemsHeading into an ETSO submittal? We arrange your sensor's requirements trace, calibration, ARP4754B and DO-160G evidence Part 23 certification basis support for flight-deck equipmentFlight-deck equipment on a normal-category aircraft? We tie crew interface, display behavior, and install assumptions toPart 23 certification basis support for navigation equipmentWhich Part 23 paragraphs apply to your navigation equipment, and what answers them? We link sensor inputs, database currPart 23 certification basis support for surveillance equipmentFor Part 23 surveillance equipment, the install carries the burden of proof. We map transponder, ADS-B, and antenna subsPart 23 certification basis support for communication equipmentBench data alone will not close a Part 23 communication basis. We map radio performance, antenna install, electrical loaPart 23 certification basis support for display systemsA display that flies well can still miss its Part 23 basis. We reconcile software level, human-factors assumptions, and Part 23 certification basis support for sensor systemsCalibration and installation effects are where Part 23 sensor questions start. We trace requirements, calibration, and qPart 25 certification basis support for flight-deck equipmentMoving equipment onto a transport flight deck? We match crew interface, display behavior, and installation assumptions tPart 25 certification basis support for navigation equipmentRedundancy is where transport navigation cases get hard. We map sensor inputs, database currency, and MOPS alignment to Part 25 certification basis support for surveillance equipmentADS-B and transponder installs get a close look on transports. We align antenna and install substantiation with your ParPart 25 certification basis support for communication equipmentAntenna coexistence and electrical load raise the hard questions on transport radios. We map them, plus performance and Part 25 certification-basis support for a transport display systemMap your transport display system to its Part 25 basis before submittal: software life-cycle data, human-factors assumptPart 25 certification-basis support for a transport sensor systemAnswering a finding on a transport sensor system? We tie requirements trace, calibration, and install effects to the ParPart 27 certification-basis support for normal-category rotorcraft flight-deck equipmentRotorcraft flight decks answer to Part 27, not fixed-wing rules. We map display behavior, crew interface, and install asPart 27 certification-basis support for rotorcraft navigation equipmentRotorcraft navigation has two yardsticks: the Part 27 basis and the MOPS. We map database currency, software level, and Part 27 certification-basis support for rotorcraft surveillance equipmentYour rotorcraft transponder and ADS-B install needs a Part 27 story: performance, antenna placement, substantiation. GetPart 27 certification-basis support for rotorcraft communication equipmentRadio performance, antenna install, electrical load, DO-160G: see where your rotorcraft comm equipment stands against eaPart 27 certification-basis support for a rotorcraft display systemA rotorcraft display touches DO-178C data, human factors, and DO-160G at once. We map every Part 27 paragraph to its eviPart 27 certification-basis support for a rotorcraft sensor systemRequirements trace, calibration, installation effects: Part 27 sensor packages fail on the quiet items. Get a standards Part 29 certification-basis support for transport rotorcraft flight-deck equipmentCrew interface, display behavior, DO-160G, installation assumptions: align transport rotorcraft flight-deck equipment toPart 29 certification-basis support for transport rotorcraft navigation equipmentBefore your transport rotorcraft nav submittal, tie sensor inputs, database currency, and software level to each Part 29Part 29 certification basis mapping for surveillance equipmentTransponder, ADS-B, and antenna substantiation for transport rotorcraft: map each applicable Part 29 rule to the evidencPart 29 certification basis mapping for communication radiosA finding on your rotorcraft radio install? Pair each Part 29 communication rule with performance, antenna, and electricPart 29 certification basis mapping for display systemsDisplay software, human factors, environmental data: connect each Part 29 display rule to its DO-178C and DO-160G evidenPart 29 certification basis mapping for sensor systemsAir data and sensor installs on transport rotorcraft stumble on trace and calibration. Bind each Part 29 sensor rule to
Product categories
Equipment categories and the certification considerations specific to each.
Airborne electronic equipment certification data supportYour electronic article needs its basis, DO-160 qualification, and assurance-level traces to agree. We run one gap read Communication equipment certification data supportA communication article must substantiate radio performance, susceptibility, and data interfaces. We find the evidence gNavigation equipment certification data supportPosition accuracy and integrity claims need evidence, and so does the environment your navigation unit flies in. See wheSurveillance equipment certification data supportTransponder and traffic-awareness articles live or die on report quality. We check the evidence against the authorizatioDisplay systems certification data supportSymbology integrity, DO-160G qualification, DO-178C assurance: a gap read of your display certification data shows what Sensor systems certification data supportMeasurement accuracy, fault detection, exposure qualification: get a gap read that traces your sensor certification dataFlight-deck equipment certification data supportCrew-interface integrity is where flight-deck articles draw questions. A gap read checks your control-function evidence Cabin electronic equipment certification data supportNon-interference, occupant safety, and any path toward the flight deck: a gap read tells you which cabin equipment evideRotorcraft equipment installation certification data supportRotor-driven vibration breaks installations that passed on paper. A gap read checks your helicopter installation data agFixed-wing equipment installation certification data supportInstalling equipment on an aeroplane? Bay environment, DO-160G categories, compliance traced to the airframe basis: get Business-aircraft equipment installation certification data supportA business jet rarely matches its type design after years of modifications. A gap read reconciles your installation dataCommercial-aircraft equipment installation certification data supportOne installation, many tails. A gap read checks your transport-category compliance data so installed conformity holds acAntenna system certification data for avionics suppliersInstalled RF performance, HIRF and lightning indirect effects, DO-160G categories by mounting location: a gap read flagsPower-supply equipment certification data supportPower-input and power-quality reports, conducted and radiated emissions, DO-254 hardware data: a gap read shows which evData-loading equipment certification data supportYour data loader carries DO-178C software plus load-verification and loaded-part configuration evidence. A gap read findRecorder equipment certification data supportImpact, fire, immersion: crash-survivability reports plus DO-178C lifecycle data and per-platform parameter sets. See whFire detection and suppression equipment evidence review for DO-160GChecking fire detection and suppression equipment? EE reviews detector response-time against DO-160G and returns gaps anCritical and life-limited PMA parts evidence review for the agreed certification basisBefore submittal, EE tests critical and life-limited PMA parts records against the agreed certification basis and identiRecorder independent power supply evidence review for DO-160GFor recorder independent power supply, EE maps backup-duration to the claim and flags configuration, rationale, and sourAircraft lighting equipment evidence review for DO-160GPreparing evidence? EE reviews the aircraft lighting equipment package and returns an evidence map, exception list, and Mode S transponder evidence review for DO-160G, DO-178C, DO-254Checking Mode S transponder? EE reviews dO-181F MOPS test results against DO-160G, DO-178C, DO-254 and returns gaps and Cargo loading and restraint system evidence review for the agreed certification basisBefore submittal, EE tests cargo loading and restraint system records against the agreed certification basis and identifETSO deviation and DDP package evidence review for the agreed certification basisFor ETSO deviation and DDP package, EE maps cS-ETSO index entry to the claim and flags configuration, rationale, and souVHF communications radio evidence review for DO-160G, DO-178CPreparing evidence? EE reviews the VHF communications radio package and returns an evidence map, exception list, and cloLithium main battery retrofit evidence review for DO-160GChecking lithium main battery retrofit? EE reviews thermal runaway containment against DO-160G and returns gaps and closFuel quantity indication system evidence review for DO-160G, DO-178CBefore submittal, EE tests fuel quantity indication system records against DO-160G, DO-178C and identifies missing suppoAngle-of-attack sensor evidence review for DO-160GFor angle-of-attack sensor, EE maps repeatability test data to the claim and flags configuration, rationale, and source-GNSS/SBAS receiver evidence review for DO-160G, DO-178CPreparing evidence? EE reviews the GNSS/SBAS receiver package and returns an evidence map, exception list, and closure pInstalled physical secondary barriers for rule scope and retrofit certification dataPlanning flight deck secondary barrier stc? EE reviews certification records, configuration limits, and missing support,CPDLC and datalink retrofits for airspace mandates for airworthiness plus ops approval dataPlanning cpdlc datalink retrofit stc? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then returnP2F conversion STCs for the certification data spine of a freighter conversionPlanning passenger to freighter conversion stc? EE reviews design approval records, configuration limits, and missing suADS-B Out retrofits for pairing approvals, install data, and mandate compliancePlanning ads-b out retrofit stc? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns a rStandby / integrated standby instrument certification evidence for independence and powerPlanning standby flight display tso? EE reviews lifecycle data, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns Performance mod STCs for winglets, gross weight increases, and the paperwork behind the claimsPlanning performance modification stc? EE reviews certification records, configuration limits, and missing support, thenSpecial mission mods for role equipment approvals and role-change configuration controlPlanning special mission modification stc? EE reviews certification records, configuration limits, and missing support, Pitot-static and air data computer TSO evidence for accuracy, lag, and icingPlanning pitot static air data tso? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns Galley and lavatory insert certification evidence for attachment, flammability, and fire containmentPlanning galley lavatory insert? EE reviews certification records, configuration limits, and missing support, then returFDR TSO-C124c authorization for parameter mapping and survivability evidencePlanning flight data recorder tso c124c? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then retCrash-resistant fuel system retrofits for legacy rotorcraft for what the data package holdsPlanning rotorcraft crash resistant fuel system stc? EE reviews safety assessments, configuration limits, and missing su25-hour CVR upgrades for who actually has to retrofit, and what the data package holdsPlanning cvr 25 hour retrofit stc? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns aChoosing your PMA basis for identicality vs test-and-computation vs licensing agreementPlanning pma basis identicality test computation? EE reviews certification records, configuration limits, and missing suCabin reconfiguration STCs for flammability, egress, and the data behind a new LOPAPlanning cabin interior reconfiguration stc? EE reviews design approval records, configuration limits, and missing suppoCabin management and IFE system certification evidence for non-interference and flammabilityPlanning cabin management system? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns a 5G-tolerant radio altimeter retrofits for the certification data behind the fixPlanning radio altimeter 5g retrofit stc? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then re406 MHz ELT TSO-C126c for DO-204B performance and crash-activation evidencePlanning elt 406 tso c126c? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns a recordCVR TSO-C123c authorization for the survivability and audio evidence a recorder must closePlanning cockpit voice recorder tso c123c? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then rTCAS II / ACAS II TSO-C119e for DO-185B collision-logic evidencePlanning tcas ii acas ii tso c119e? EE reviews lifecycle data, configuration limits, and missing support, then returns aOxygen system equipment certification evidence for flow, altitude, and fire safetyPlanning oxygen system equipment tso? EE reviews DO-160G reports, configuration limits, and missing support, then returnSeat and restraint TSO-C127 evidence for run-time 16g testing and injury criteriaPlanning seat restraint tso c127? EE reviews certification records, configuration limits, and missing support, then retuFlight-deck equipment certification evidence for TSO authorizationApplying for TSO authorization on flight-deck equipment? Get an article-specific gap list against the minimum performancFlight-deck equipment certification evidence for STC installationSTC installation approval hinges on the aircraft's basis, not the article alone. Get an installation-specific gap list: Flight-deck equipment qualification evidence reviewDo your environmental categories, software data, and interface tests meet the article's requirements? A qualification evNavigation equipment certification evidence for TSO authorizationGNSS receivers and nav equipment stall at TSO on sensor inputs and database currency. Get an article-specific gap list aNavigation equipment certification evidence for STC installationAntenna siting, sensor integration, interference: your nav STC lives or dies on installation evidence. Get a gap list tiNavigation equipment qualification evidence reviewYour navigation article's test results look complete until they are mapped to the MOPS. We flag every qualification gap,Surveillance equipment certification evidence for TSO authorizationTransponder, ADS-B, and antenna substantiation reviewed before your TSO application goes in. Every evidence gap listed aSurveillance equipment installation evidence for an STC approvalAntenna siting, bonding, and interface data must trace to the certification basis. We map each installation evidence gapSurveillance equipment qualification evidence reviewA DO-160G campaign can pass every test and still miss the categories your certification claims depend on. We check reporCommunication equipment certification evidence for TSO authorizationRadio performance, electrical load, and environmental evidence checked before you file for TSO authorization. Get a gap Communication equipment installation evidence for an STC approvalYour radio STC stalls when bonding, load, or interface data does not trace to the basis. Get the installation gap list, Communication equipment qualification evidence reviewEMI margins that looked fine in the lab can sink a certification claim. We review DO-160G categories, reports, and margiDisplay system certification evidence for TSO authorizationDisplay TSO applications stall on software life-cycle data and human-factors assumptions. See which evidence gaps to cloDisplay system installation evidence for an STC approvalField of view, lighting, and interface data must all trace to the basis. We rank your display STC installation gaps so tDisplay system software and environmental qualification evidence reviewDO-178C objectives and DO-160G categories rarely fail alone; the gaps sit where they meet. We review your display data tSensor system certification evidence for TSO authorizationRequirements trace, calibration, and environmental data reviewed before your sensor TSO filing. Know which evidence gapsSensor system STC installation certification supportOpen compliance findings decide when your sensor STC closes. We key each evidence gap to its finding and rank them by whSensor system qualification certification supportOne invalid test report can undo a sensor qualification claim. We map every DO-160G category to a valid, applicable repoAntenna system TSO certification supportRF performance, lightning, and structural attachment data checked against the TSO standard. Gaps keyed to each required Antenna system STC installation certification supportStructural attachment, RF coexistence, and lightning zoning all have to close before your antenna STC does. Get the gap Antenna system qualification certification supportAn antenna claim is only as strong as its reports. We map each RF, lightning, and DO-160G requirement to a valid test rePower supply equipment TSO certification supportTSO reviewers trace every electrical, power quality, and thermal parameter to test data. Get a gap list keyed to each rePower supply equipment STC installation certification supportBus loading, cooling, and wiring protection all need substantiation before your STC moves. See the open electrical findiPower supply equipment qualification certification supportPower supply data has to cover the requirement before it anchors a claim. Get a coverage assessment across electrical, pData-loading equipment TSO certification supportData loader TSO applications stall on open DO-178C objectives more often than hardware. Get a gap list of the software aData-loading equipment STC installation certification supportLoading interfaces and target-system effects draw the hardest STC questions. We list your loader's open installation finData-loading equipment qualification evidence supportSoftware loading controls and configuration data face the qualification reviewer first. Get a device-specific gap list rRecorder equipment TSO authorization evidence supportSurvivability assumptions, interfaces, software, environment: recorder TSO evidence has to hold at every layer. See whicRecorder equipment STC installation evidence supportA qualified recorder still has to prove how it mounts, wires, and integrates on your airframe. See your installation gapRecorder equipment qualification evidence supportRecorder qualification reviews stall when survivability or environmental results miss the article build. We find the bloCabin electronic equipment TSO authorization supportPower, wiring, and flammability interfaces decide a cabin electronics TSO. Get an equipment-specific gap list ordered byCabin electronic equipment STC installation supportYour cabin is not the bench article. STC review wants power and flammability shown for the actual installation. We rank Cabin electronic equipment qualification evidence supportQualification reviewers reconcile cabin electronics results to the article build, line by line. Know which open requiremConnectivity system TSO authorization evidence supportConnectivity TSO packages fail on airworthiness security as often as environment. We trace antenna, network, and DO-326AConnectivity system STC installation evidence supportAntenna, network integration, and DO-326A security must be shown on your airframe. Get the installation gap list orderedConnectivity system qualification evidence supportConnectivity qualification review ahead? We reconcile DO-326A security, architecture, and DO-160G results to the articleWeather radar evidence support for TSO authorizationFiling a weather radar TSO? We check antenna, display, software, and environmental data, keying each evidence gap line bWeather radar evidence support for STC installation approvalYour radar is proven, but the STC asks about this airframe. We check radome interface, mounting, and display integrationWeather radar qualification evidence review and supportReusing radar qualification data on a new application? We check DO-160G categories and software assurance against the inAutopilot system evidence support for TSO authorizationAn autopilot TSO stands or falls on the safety argument. We reconcile ARP4761A assessment, software DAL, and verificatioAutopilot system evidence support for STC installation approvalFitting an autopilot under an STC? Servo integration, flight-control interfaces, and aircraft-level safety effects need Autopilot system qualification evidence review and supportDoes your autopilot verification coverage meet the assigned DAL? We check DO-178C data, safety inputs, and environmentalEngine-control equipment evidence support for TSO authorizationEngine-control TSO evidence slips when software and hardware assurance diverge. We tie DO-178C, DO-254, and DO-160G dataEngine-control equipment evidence support for STC installation approvalAn STC review asks how your engine-control unit survives the engine's thermal and vibration environment and what a faultEngine-control equipment qualification evidence reviewReusing engine-control qualification data on a new build? We check DO-254 hardware, DO-178C software, and DO-160G againsHealth-monitoring equipment evidence support for TSO authorizationHUMS or health-monitoring TSO ahead? Function classification sets the software level and the data integrity case. Get a Health-monitoring equipment evidence for STC installation approvalInstalling health monitoring under an STC? Sensor interfaces, data integrity, and lifecycle data must trace to the instaHealth-monitoring equipment qualification evidence reviewA reviewer will check your health-monitoring qualification data against the basis. We get there first: environmental catRotorcraft installation evidence for TSO authorizationRotorcraft installations punish equipment. We check vibration qualification, power, and continued-airworthiness data agaRotorcraft installation evidence for STC installation approvalA rotorcraft STC turns on installation evidence: vibration and power qualification, constraints, and continued airworthiRotorcraft installation qualification evidence reviewVibration severity, power quality, and assurance data checked against your rotorcraft certification basis. Get the gap lBusiness-aircraft installation evidence for TSO authorizationTSO authorization stalls when installation evidence stops at the box. Cabin, electrical load, and continued-airworthinesBusiness-aircraft installation evidence for STC installation approvalAn STC installation approval reads the whole package. We reconcile cabin, load, and continued-airworthiness data againstBusiness-aircraft installation qualification evidence reviewEnvironmental categories, electrical load, and cabin assumptions rarely match the basis on first pass. Your installation
Certification problems
Common evidence gaps and findings, and how they are closed.
Requirements marked met without verification evidence behind themA met status with no test, analysis, inspection, or review record behind it will not survive review. We surface every unCompliance-matrix entries that cite superseded or moved documentsDocument revisions moved on but your compliance matrix still cites the old ones. We check every citation and flag each aCertification-basis items missing from the compliance matrixA basis item your compliance matrix never picked up means nothing addresses it. We reconcile basis to matrix and hand yoDerived requirements missing from the trace and safety assessmentDesign work spawns derived requirements, and some never enter the trace or feed the safety assessment. We list every orpEnvironmental qualification that misses the categories the installation needsYour installation environment demands DO-160 categories the test report never covered. We compare levels line by line anSoftware lifecycle data that does not match the assigned software levelStructural coverage and independence shortfalls show up late in DO-178C programs. We check your data against the assigneAirborne hardware data that does not match its design-assurance levelDO-254 data that trails its design-assurance level, often on verification or elemental analysis, invites findings. We itWhen a certification requirement has no means of compliance assignedA basis requirement with no means of compliance assigned will stall your program at submittal. We build a coverage map eCertification compliance claims that the evidence does not supportEvery compliance claim gets tested when the reviewer pulls the cited evidence. Get a register of unsupported claims and Certification findings left open with no closure evidence on fileFindings answered but never evidenced keep a certification program open. Get a closure-status map: what is truly closed,Closing TSO requirements marked complete without verification evidenceRequirements marked complete but carrying no verification evidence stall a TSO review. Each one is traced to test, analyRefreshing stale compliance-matrix citations in a TSO programCitations pointing at superseded evidence turn a TSO review into findings. Every matrix entry is re-cited, confirmed agaClosing coverage gaps against the certification basis in a TSO programParts of your certification basis carry no planned compliance data. We map the basis, surface each uncovered requirementClosing derived requirements that never fed back into the trace on a TSO programDerived requirements in design notes never reached your trace or the safety assessment. Each one is recovered and documeClosing qualification gaps where DO-160 categories fail to bound the installationWhen DO-160 test categories fail to bound the real installation, qualification claims collapse. Categories, assumptions,Closing software data that does not satisfy its assigned DO-178C levelSoftware lifecycle data short of its assigned DAL stalls a TSO program. Evidence is mapped to DO-178C objectives, every Closing hardware data that does not support its assigned design assurance levelDO-254 data that cannot support its assigned DAL invites a deeper audit. Lifecycle data is mapped to objectives and confClosing requirements that have no means of compliance in a TSO programA requirement with no means of compliance is a finding in waiting. Each open item gets a MOC, an evidence source, and a Closing certification claims that no document substantiates in a TSO programCompliance claims with no document behind them unravel under audit. Every claim is tied to current evidence or restated Closing findings marked closed without evidence that answers themThe finding register says closed; the evidence does not answer the issue. Closure evidence, dispositions, and residual oClosing evidence, test article, and submitted configuration that do not matchYour evidence, test article, and submitted configuration disagree. Baselines, revisions, and conformity records reconcilClosing ICA that does not cover the approved configuration in a TSO programYour ICA misses parts of the approved TSO configuration. Get a closure brief listing every uncovered part, limitation, aClosing STC requirements marked complete without verification evidenceRequirements marked complete in your STC data with no test, analysis, or inspection behind them. Get a closure brief perRefreshing stale compliance-matrix citations before an STC submittalYour STC compliance matrix cites superseded reports, wrong revisions, moved documents. We resolve every citation to currClosing coverage gaps against the STC certification basisCertification-basis requirements that never made your STC compliance plan surface in review. Get a coverage map tying eaClosing derived requirements missing from the STC trace and safety assessmentDerived requirements born in design but missing from your STC trace and safety assessment. We relink each one up and dowClosing STC qualification gaps against DO-160 environmental categoriesDO-160 categories that do not bound the installation environment stall an STC. Get a reconciliation mapping your installClosing STC software data inconsistent with its assigned DO-178C levelSoftware lifecycle data that misses DO-178C objectives for its assigned level draws findings. We map your evidence objecClosing STC hardware data inconsistent with its design assurance levelDO-254 hardware data short of its assigned DAL invites rework. Get an objective map of DAL against delivered data, reconClosing STC requirements that have no assigned means of complianceRequirements on your STC compliance plan with no method or owner. We assign each a means of compliance, evidence source,Closing STC compliance claims asserted without substantiating evidenceCompliance claims with no document behind them undo an STC package in review. Get a claim-by-claim audit marking each asClosing STC finding-register items marked closed without closure evidenceA finding register with items marked closed but nothing answering the issue. We attach closure evidence, a disposition, Closing configuration baseline mismatches in a STC programTest article, submitted data, and as-built evidence disagree on your STC baseline. We reconcile all three and hand your Closing gaps in the ICA package for a STCInstructions for Continued Airworthiness leaving your STC modification partly uncovered. Get a brief pairing each gap wiClosing requirements marked complete without verification evidenceThe trace says verified, yet no test, analysis, inspection, or review evidence exists. We list every affected requiremenRefreshing stale citations in a compliance matrix before submittalSuperseded or inconsistent citations sink a compliance matrix at submittal. We catalogue every stale entry with its corrClosing coverage gaps against the certification basis before submittalRequirements in your certification basis with no compliance data planned against them? We assign each a means of compliaClosing derived requirements that never reached the traceDerived requirements outside the trace and safety assessment are a classic submittal finding. We link each to verificatiClosing qualification gaps against the installation environmentDO-160 categories that don't bound the install environment stop reviews cold. We reconcile categories, installation assuClosing software data that falls short of its assigned levelSoftware lifecycle data that misses DO-178C objectives for its assigned level invites rejection. Get the unsatisfied objClosing hardware data that falls short of its design assurance levelDO-254 hardware data that cannot support its assigned DAL stalls the package. We map every unsupported objective to the Closing requirements with no means of compliance assignedRequirements with no means of compliance and no evidence owner will not survive review. Each gets a method, an evidence Closing unsupported compliance claims before a certification submittalA compliance package asserting what no document proves invites hard questions. We tie each unsupported claim to evidenceClearing findings marked closed without real closure evidenceFindings marked closed with nothing behind them resurface at the worst moment. We audit your register, attach real closuReconciling configuration baselines before a certification submittalIf the tested configuration, built article, and submitted baseline disagree, your package describes three products. We mClosing ICA package gaps against the approved configurationICA that skips parts, tasks, or limitations of the approved configuration draws findings. We map each gap so your Instru
AI in certification work
Where AI assists certification evidence and document review, and where authorized persons and authorities remain the decision-makers.
AI assistance and DO-330 tool qualification decisionsScope AI use in certification work against DO-330 tool qualification criteria, with plan language, human-review evidenceAI-assisted revision and cross-reference control for certification dataUse AI-assisted revision and cross-reference checks to find certification document-control gaps before a package is submAI-assisted comparison of DO-160 reports against installation-zone needsCompare vendor DO-160 qualification categories with installation-zone conditions before an STC or equipment-selection deAI-assisted organization of DO-254 hardware lifecycle dataOrganize DO-254 hardware lifecycle data with AI-assisted checks for requirements, verification, configuration, and open AI ARP4761A safety assessment consistency for safety assessment closure before submittalCheck ARP4761A safety assessment consistency across FHA, PSSA, SSA, fault trees, FMEA, assumptions, and verification eviAI STC program consistency management for stc program in flight with a growing document setUse AI-assisted checks to keep STC plans, matrices, findings, reports, and ICA records aligned during an active modificaAI ARP4754B development assurance data for system design review or development assurance auditOrganize ARP4754B development assurance data with AI-assisted checks for requirements, validation, allocation, interfaceAI compliance matrix generation for compliance matrix build or pre-submittal verificationDraft and maintain certification compliance matrix rows with AI assistance while engineers approve every basis paragraphAI supplier lifecycle data oversight for supplier data deliveries before an integration gateReview supplier DO-178C and DO-254 lifecycle data deliveries with AI-assisted screening and engineer-verified exception AI conformity evidence reconciliation for conformity inspection or test credit claimReconcile conformity requests, inspection records, deviations, test reports, and configuration baselines before claimingAI supplier FMEA to SSA reconciliation for safety data delivery to an integratorReconcile supplier FMEA and FMES data with the integrator SSA, fault tree, rates, assumptions, and aircraft-level safetyAI DER review packet preparation for data submission to a consulting derPrepare DER review packets by checking 8110-3 scope, engineering reports, data references, revisions, and missing substaAI ODA project file preparation for oda project file assembly ahead of um findingsPrepare ODA project files with AI-assisted completeness checks against procedures-manual requirements before unit memberAI FAA certification project planning for program kickoff or replanBuild an FAA certification project plan inventory with AI-assisted dependency mapping, deliverable ownership, and manageAI issue paper and CRI tracking for active issue papers or cris on a programTrack FAA issue papers and EASA CRIs with AI-assisted commitment extraction, owner mapping, and document-impact checks.AI ODA self audit preparation for scheduled faa supervision audit or annual self-auditPrepare ODA self-audits and FAA supervision reviews with AI-assisted project-file sampling against procedures-manual reqAI DO-178C lifecycle data preparation for upcoming soi audit or software submittalOrganize DO-178C lifecycle data before SOI review with AI-assisted checks for plans, standards, trace, verification, SCIAI role boundaries in aircraft certification for certification evidence controlClear boundaries for AI in aircraft certification: evidence indexing, cross-reference checks, exception flags, and humanAI supplier compliance matrix screening for multiple supplier matrix deliveries before an integration gateScreen supplier compliance matrices with AI-assisted coverage, citation, MoC, and exception-density checks before integrAI DO-160 qualification evidence organization for qualification file assembly before submittalOrganize DO-160 qualification files with AI-assisted checks for category claims, test reports, procedures, conditions, aAI outsourced STC program oversight for outsourced stc milestone reviewReview outsourced STC milestone evidence with AI-assisted checks for matrix coverage, finding closure, ICA readiness, anAI certification basis mapping for new certification program or major change scopingEvaluate AI-assisted certification basis mapping with paragraph citations, amendment-level checks, special conditions, aAI EASA validation package preparation for easa validation of an faa approvalPrepare EASA validation packages from FAA approval data with AI-assisted checks for matrix mapping, TIP classification, AI requirements flowdown reconciliation for requirement allocation updates mid-programReconcile requirement flowdown between integrator allocations and supplier implementation with AI-assisted trace and verAI changed product rule basis review for major change or amended tc on an aging platformMap changed and affected areas for changed product rule analysis with AI-assisted evidence organization and engineer-rev
Next step
Review a certification evidence package
Tell us the asset, the event, and the evidence in scope, and we will outline a focused first engagement.