Certification evidence
FAA-EASA TIP validation for building the data package the validating authority accepts
certification manager, der or cve, program managers use this page when STC or TC change validation between FAA and EASA. EE reviews certification basis comparison, classification rationale, compliance documentation the validating authority reviews versus accepts with the baseline data and cited standards or rules. The buyer receives a mapped record set, unsupported-claim log, missing-data request list, and action plan that separates complete evidence from items needing specialist judgment.
What gets reviewed
- Compare certification basis comparison against the claim it supports.
- Trace classification rationale against the claim it supports.
- Challenge compliance documentation the validating authority reviews versus accepts against the claim it supports.
- Reconcile open issue papers or CRIs and their closure evidence against the claim it supports.
- Confirm approval basis against the claim it supports.
- Index configuration definition against the claim it supports.
What gets validated
- Evidence link: certification basis comparison fails review if the cited record cannot be tied to the current baseline.
- Limit carryover: classification rationale fails review if the cited record cannot be tied to the current baseline.
- Source control: compliance documentation the validating authority reviews versus accepts fails review if the cited record cannot be tied to the current baseline.
- Closure owner: open issue papers or CRIs and their closure evidence fails review if the cited record cannot be tied to the current baseline.
- Configuration match: approval basis fails review if the cited record cannot be tied to the current baseline.
Evidence normally required
- Test file: certification basis comparison
- Analysis note: classification rationale
- Manual source: compliance documentation the validating authority reviews versus accepts
- Configuration item: open issue papers or CRIs and their closure evidence
- Closure evidence: approval basis
- Baseline record: configuration definition
Common discrepancies
- Installer issue: packages built for the certificating authority resubmitted unchanged to the validating one.
- Buyer concern: misclassification triggering full technical review mid-project.
- Program risk: missing basis-difference analyses stalling validation while the commercial deal waits on the approval.
- Authority question: baseline does not match the delivered records.
Move from findings to resolution
Identify gaps against the means of compliance.
How the work runs
Frame FAA EASA
Confirm the exact event, affected file set, buyer role, and decision standard before any certification basis comparison is treated as sufficient.
Trace Validation Data
Walk the named evidence from index entry to source artifact and mark where the trail supports, conflicts with, or fails to answer the page-specific question.
Sort Evidence Review
Group exceptions by closure route: document retrieval, data correction, engineering disposition, authority response, or contractual decision.
Package Validating Authority
Deliver the exception list, evidence map, and owner sequence in a form that can move directly into remediation, submittal cleanup, or transaction negotiation.
What the buyer receives
- Evidence map for FAA EASA Tip Validation data
- Discrepancy register for FAA EASA Tip Validation data
- Applicability and approval basis summary
- Source record request list
Who uses the output
- certification managers use the map to brief the decision.
- DER or CVEs use the register to assign closure.
- program managers use the request list to collect source records.
How the work fits into the transaction or program
The what a design approval holder must assemble for validation of an STC or TC change under the FAA-EASA Technical Implementation Procedures, and where the significant/non-significant classification changes the evidence burden; the certification basis comparison, the classification rationale, compliance documentation the validating authority reviews versus accepts, open issue papers or CRIs and their closure evidence. The evidence set centers on the certification basis comparison, the classification rationale, compliance documentation the validating authority reviews versus accepts, open issue papers or CRIs and their closure evidence. The likely weak points are packages built for the certificating authority resubmitted unchanged to the validating one, misclassification triggering full technical review mid-project, missing basis-difference analyses stalling validation while the commercial deal waits on the approval. The output gives the certification manager a cleanup register for FAA-EASA TIP validation for building the data package the validating authority accepts before STC or TC change validation between FAA and EASA.
Start with a single asset
Confirm requirements trace through verification.
Regulatory limits
EE does not replace the applicant, STC holder, authorized representative, or regulator. Approval, acceptance, and airworthiness decisions remain with the people and authorities assigned to those functions.
Specific to this review
- what a design approval holder must assemble for validation of an STC or TC change under the FAA-EASA Technical Implementation Procedures, and where the significant/non-significant classification changes the evidence burden.
- Certification basis comparison often controls whether later summaries can be trusted.
- Packages built for the certificating authority resubmitted unchanged to the validating one is treated as a record gap until an owner closes it.
- FAA and EASA evidence should stay distinguishable from commercial claims and installer notes.
- The scope uses the FAA EASA Tip Validation question as the control point, so the review stays tied to STC or TC change validation between FAA and EASA and the buyer decision behind it.
- The evidence starts with Certification basis comparison and follows Data Package Evidence Review references until every exception has a source location and a reason code.
- The finding logic separates missing paperwork, conflicting status, stale revision data, and unsupported disposition because each class closes through a different owner.
- The timing matters for certification manager: the output is useful only if the unresolved items are visible before acceptance, submittal, handback, or negotiation pressure fixes the sequence.
- The boundary control keeps Building Validating Authority Accepts questions in the records or certification lane and sends technical acceptance issues to the authorized people who own them.
- The handoff value comes from Evidence map for FAA EASA Tip Validation data; it gives the next reviewer a precise map instead of another broad request for a better file.
Sources
U.S. Government (eCFR). Type certificates, STCs (Subpart E), TSO authorizations (Subpart O), PMA (Subpart K), and export airworthiness approvals (Subpart L).
European Union / EASA. EASA design and production certification, STCs, ETSO authorizations, and EASA Form 1 release.
Federal Aviation Administration. FAA type certification process, certification basis establishment, and compliance findings.
Frequently asked questions
What makes this standards review different from a general file audit?
The scope is tied to faa easa tip validation and to the decision named in the request. A general audit can list weak records; this pass ranks the gaps by whether they block stc or tc change validation between faa and easa or can be closed later without changing the decision.
What evidence has to be available before this work starts?
The starting point is certification basis comparison, the current status source, and any index or matrix that tells reviewers where the supporting artifact should live. Missing inputs are logged as findings rather than filled with assumptions.
Who decides whether an open item is acceptable?
The review explains what the evidence supports and gives certification manager a closure path. Acceptance remains with the buyer, operator, authority, delegated engineer, or authorized person responsible for the underlying airworthiness or certification decision.
Relevant glossary terms
Related pages
Where this fits
Talk to an engineer who has done this work
We will walk through your current state, the records or evidence involved, and a scoped first engagement.
Talk through the aircraft, records, evidence, deadline, and next useful step.