Skip to content

Airworthiness review

Airbus A350 family airworthiness review evidence records review

This review examines the airworthiness review evidence held for an Airbus A350 family aircraft and confirms the continued-airworthiness position behind each review certificate is real and current. It is run by or for a lessor, operator, or manager relying on a CAMO's airworthiness review record for a specific serial number. It reads the review certificates against the CAMO's supporting records, the open-finding log, and the continued-airworthiness status the review rested on, testing whether the certificate reflects the actual state of the file. You receive an exception list where the review evidence does not support the certificate, a source map to the records behind each finding, and a plan to close the open items.

When this review is needed

  • A serial number is being taken on and the airworthiness review record has to be confirmed before reliance.
  • The review certificate is current but the open-finding log behind it has not been checked.
  • A CAMO change means the continued-airworthiness status behind the review needs independent confirmation.
  • A buyer needs the airworthiness review evidence proven before it relies on the certificate.

The problem

An airworthiness review certificate is a conclusion, and a conclusion is only as sound as the evidence and open findings behind it. A certificate can be current while findings raised during the review sit open, or while the continued-airworthiness status it rested on has since moved. On an A350 managed through a CAMO, the review draws on AD status, life-limited standing, and modification records that live in separate systems, so a certificate issued in good faith can rest on a status snapshot that no longer matches the file. The certificate reads settled while the position underneath it has drifted.

What gets reviewed

  • Each review certificate matched to the CAMO records and the status it rested on
  • The open-finding log from the review checked for items still unresolved
  • AD, life-limited, and modification status behind the review confirmed still current
  • Continued-airworthiness status reports reconciled to the certificate they support
  • Recurring review recommendations and conditions confirmed as carried forward
  • Findings unsupported or unresolved carried onto an exception list with the record owed

Scope this review

Tell us the asset, the event, and the evidence in scope, and we will outline a focused first engagement.

Send a representative, redacted record set and we will scope the review.

What gets validated

  • Each review certificate is supported by the CAMO records and status behind it
  • No finding raised during the review remains open without a documented resolution
  • The AD and life-limited status the review rested on still matches the current file
  • Continued-airworthiness status reports agree with the certificate that draws on them
  • Conditions or recommendations from the review are carried into the ongoing program

Evidence normally required

  • The airworthiness review certificates and the review file
  • CAMO records supporting the review
  • The open-finding log from the review
  • Current AD, life-limited part, and modification status reports
  • Continued-airworthiness status reports for the aircraft

Common discrepancies

  • A current review certificate with findings from that review still open
  • A status basis behind the review that has moved since the certificate was issued
  • A recommendation from the review that was never carried into the program
  • A continued-airworthiness status report that contradicts the certificate drawing on it

What is at stake

Relying on a review certificate whose findings are still open, or whose status basis has moved, means relying on a conclusion the current evidence no longer supports. That surfaces when a counterparty or a receiving CAMO tests the review record and finds the open items, at which point the certificate carries less weight and the aircraft's continued-airworthiness position has to be rebuilt under time pressure rather than confirmed at leisure.

Move from findings to resolution

Move from findings to a documented resolution path.

How the work runs

01

Read the certificate to its file

Match each review certificate to the CAMO records and status it was built on.

02

Work the open findings

Check the review's finding log for items still unresolved and trace each to its record.

03

Confirm the status basis holds

Verify the AD, life-limited, and modification status behind the review is still current.

04

List the exceptions

Flag findings and status points the certificate no longer supports and set the plan to close them.

What the buyer receives

  • An exception list where the review evidence does not support the certificate
  • A source map from each finding to the CAMO record behind it
  • A plan to close the open findings and reconcile the status basis

Who uses the output

  • Records teams confirming the review record before the aircraft is relied on
  • Continuing-airworthiness staff taking over a serial number from a prior CAMO
  • Diligence teams testing the airworthiness review evidence before acceptance

How the work fits into the transaction or program

The airworthiness review record is often the headline evidence a receiving party leans on, so this review tests whether that headline holds. It reconciles the certificate to its findings and its status basis, then feeds any open item into remediation before a receiving CAMO or a counterparty tests the same record. The confirmed review evidence supports the redelivery binder and the continued-airworthiness handover the aircraft moves into.

Aircraft-specific considerations

On an A350 managed through a CAMO, the airworthiness review draws on AD status, Trent XWB engine life-limited standing, and a dense modification record that sit in separate systems, so the certificate rests on a status snapshot that can move between review and reliance. The type's software and avionics configuration is part of the continued-airworthiness picture, so a review that predates a software or modification change may rest on a configuration the file has since left behind.

Jurisdiction-specific considerations

The airworthiness review record is an EASA continuing-airworthiness construct, so where the aircraft is moving toward an FAA register the review confirms the evidence but notes that the receiving system does not carry the same certificate, and the continued-airworthiness position will have to be presented in the form that system expects.

Regulatory limits

The review confirms the airworthiness review evidence and reports where the certificate is not supported. It does not issue or renew an airworthiness review certificate, act as the CAMO, or make an airworthiness determination; those rest with the approved CAMO and the authority.

What this review does not cover

Specific to this review

  • A review certificate is a conclusion, so its open-finding log and status basis matter as much as the certificate date itself.
  • The AD and life-limited status a review rested on can move between issue and reliance, leaving the certificate resting on a snapshot the file has left behind.
  • The airworthiness review record is an EASA construct with no direct FAA equivalent, so it does not carry unchanged to an FAA register.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

The airworthiness review certificate is current. Why check behind it?

The certificate is a conclusion drawn at a point in time. Findings raised during the review can still be open, and the AD or life-limited status it rested on can have moved since. The review reconciles the certificate to its finding log and its status basis so a certificate that reads current but is no longer fully supported shows up as an exception.

Relevant glossary terms

Related pages

Where this fits

Talk to an engineer who has done this work

We will walk through your current state, the records or evidence involved, and a scoped first engagement.

Talk through the aircraft, records, evidence, deadline, and next useful step.