Mature widebody asset
Boeing 767 aircraft records review
A Boeing 767 records review checks one mature airframe against the documentation a sale, lease return, or cargo conversion rests on, run for a lessor, buyer, or operator. On an aircraft that has often flown for decades the decisive material is the aging-aircraft and corrosion prevention history with its finding dispositions, any passenger-to-freighter conversion and the approval data embodying it, and the older repairs whose substantiation rarely survived intact. You receive a per-area trace, a register of unresolved items, and the evidence each needs before the asset moves to its next role.
When this review is needed
- A 767 is being acquired for cargo and the freighter conversion records have to be confirmed.
- An aging airframe is changing hands and corrosion program findings drive the structural value.
- A long-life aircraft carries a deep repair file and the approvals behind the older work need checking.
- A redelivery offer is on the table and the team wants an independent read on a mature widebody.
The problem
A 767 commonly carries an aging-aircraft program, a long corrosion prevention and control history, and frequently a freighter conversion layered onto the original type design. The status list states a current position, but supplemental inspection findings, the conversion supplemental approval data, and repairs accumulated across many operators sit in different parts of the file. When that depth is left untraced, a mature airframe gets priced as cleaner than its records can actually support.
What gets reviewed
- Aging-aircraft and corrosion prevention and control program status with finding dispositions
- Supplemental structural inspection findings and how each was dispositioned
- Passenger-to-freighter conversion records and the supplemental approval data embodying them
- Accumulated repair history and the approved data supporting each major repair
- Airworthiness Directive position checked against original accomplishment records
- Time and cycle accumulation reconciled across operators and the current status list
Scope this review
Tell us the asset, the event, and the evidence in scope, and we will outline a focused first engagement.
Send a representative, redacted record set and we will scope the review.
What gets validated
- Aging-aircraft and corrosion program tasks are recorded with their findings dispositioned
- The conversion records cite the supplemental approval data that supports the freighter configuration
- Each major repair references approved data appropriate to a mature transport structure
- AD closures rest on original accomplishment evidence showing the method of compliance
- Supplemental inspection results are carried forward consistently across operator changes
- Recorded hours and cycles agree between the logbooks and the status summary
Evidence normally required
- Corrosion prevention and control program records with the findings history
- Conversion records and the supplemental approval data, where the aircraft has been converted
- Structural repair file with the approved data behind each major repair
- Current AD and service bulletin status with accomplishment evidence
- Logbooks or digital records spanning the prior operators
Common discrepancies
- Corrosion findings recorded without a clear disposition or follow-up action
- Conversion records missing part of the supplemental approval data
- An older major repair carried forward without traceable approved data
- AD closures inherited from prior operators without source evidence
- Supplemental inspection results that do not carry cleanly across an operator change
What is at stake
Corrosion findings without a recorded disposition can reopen during transition and force inspection before the airframe is accepted. Conversion approval data that is incomplete can stall the cargo role it was bought for, and an older repair carried without traceable approved data may need reconstruction or rework, all of which is cheaper to surface before money moves than after.
How the work runs
Map the aging-aircraft picture
Establish the corrosion program, supplemental inspection history, and any conversion, then set the record sets in scope for this serial number.
Disposition the structure
Trace corrosion and inspection findings to their recorded dispositions and confirm older repairs carry approved data.
Confirm the conversion
Check the freighter conversion records against the supplemental approval data that embodies the configuration.
Register and settle
Record each finding against its source and name the party positioned to close it before acceptance.
What the buyer receives
- A per-area trace across corrosion program, conversion, and repair history
- A findings register linking each item to its source and the disposition gap
- A settlement path for each item with the party able to close it identified
Who uses the output
- Asset and acquisition teams pricing a mature widebody
- Records teams preparing the airframe for its next role
- Engineering judging an older repair or corrosion finding without a clear disposition
How the work fits into the transaction or program
The review precedes acceptance so corrosion, conversion, and repair questions are raised while the seller still holds the leverage to resolve them. Its output supports the cargo or continued-service decision and the records baseline the next operator maintains.
Start with a single asset
Start with a single tail and expand once the workflow is proven.
Aircraft-specific considerations
On a mature 767 the corrosion prevention and control history is read as a record of findings and dispositions, not as a checklist of completed tasks, because how each finding was resolved is what tells a buyer the real structural condition. Where the aircraft has been converted, the supplemental approval data and its embodiment records are treated as part of the asset being bought, since the freighter role depends on them.
Regulatory limits
The review confirms records completeness, consistency, and traceability. It does not make an airworthiness determination, validate the conversion approval, or guarantee acceptance by any operator or authority.
What this review does not cover
- Physical inspection or corrosion survey of the structure
- Validation or re-issue of the conversion approval
- Any airworthiness determination or regulatory approval
Specific to this review
- On a mature 767 the corrosion history is read as findings and dispositions, because how each was resolved tells the real structural story.
- Many 767s in trade have been converted to freighters, so the supplemental approval data is part of the records being acquired.
- Decades across many operators mean older repairs often need their approved data reconstructed, since the substantiation rarely traveled intact.
Sources
U.S. Government (eCFR). Maintenance recordkeeping content and approval-for-return-to-service requirements, including 43.9, 43.11, and Appendix B.
Federal Aviation Administration. FAA guidance on making and keeping maintenance records and acceptable recordkeeping practices.
U.S. Government (eCFR). The legal basis for issuing and enforcing Airworthiness Directives on U.S.-registered products.
European Union / EASA. Continuing airworthiness, maintenance records, CAMO responsibilities, and the airworthiness review process in the EASA system.
Frequently asked questions
Does a freighter conversion change what you review?
Yes. A converted 767 adds the conversion approval data and its embodiment records to the review, alongside the aging-aircraft and corrosion history any mature airframe carries.
Why focus on finding dispositions rather than completed tasks?
On a long-life structure the disposition of each corrosion or inspection finding is what describes the real condition, so the review traces how findings were resolved rather than only that the tasks were run.
Relevant glossary terms
Related pages
Where this fits
Talk to an engineer who has done this work
We will walk through your current state, the records or evidence involved, and a scoped first engagement.
Walk through your situation with an engineer who has done this work.