Export airworthiness
Bombardier CRJ family export-airworthiness records review
This review confirms that the records package supporting a CRJ's export airworthiness certificate is complete and answers the importing authority's special conditions before the certificate is sought. It fits a team evaluating or transferring one tail across a border, and it works from that aircraft's export evidence package rather than a generic checklist. The work assembles the status summaries the exporting authority will need, tests them against the importing authority's stated requirements, and flags the records gaps that would stall the certificate. You receive an exception list of missing or non-conforming evidence, a source map for the package, and a closure plan for that airframe.
When this review is needed
- A CRJ is being sold across a border and the export certificate hinges on a complete records package.
- The importing authority has issued special conditions and the records have to be tested against them.
- A prior export attempt stalled on records and the package is being rebuilt before reapplying.
- A status summary the exporting authority requires has to be reconciled to the underlying records.
The problem
An export certificate for a CRJ depends on a records package that satisfies two authorities at once, and the importing authority's special conditions rarely match the way the file was kept. AD status, life-limited part trace, and configuration have to be presented in summaries the exporting authority accepts, while the importing authority may demand additional compliance the records were never organized to show. The package looks ready until a special condition surfaces a gap the exporting review then holds up on.
What gets reviewed
- Export status summaries assembled for AD, life-limited parts, and configuration
- Importing-authority special conditions mapped against the available records
- Compliance records checked to support the exporting authority's export requirements
- Supporting evidence behind each status summary confirmed retrievable
- Records gaps that would stall the certificate identified before application
- Outstanding modifications or repairs relevant to the importing authority flagged
Scope this review
Tell us the asset, the event, and the evidence in scope, and we will outline a focused first engagement.
Send a representative, redacted record set and we will scope the review.
What gets validated
- Each export status summary reconciles to the underlying records it claims to represent
- The importing authority's special conditions each map to evidence in the package
- AD and compliance status meets the exporting authority's export requirements
- Life-limited part and configuration evidence supports the summaries presented
- Every gap likely to hold up the certificate is identified before the application goes in
Evidence normally required
- The export evidence package assembled for the aircraft
- The importing authority's special requirements or conditions
- Current AD, life-limited part, and configuration status summaries
- The compliance records supporting the export requirements
- Prior export correspondence where an earlier attempt was made
Common discrepancies
- An importing-authority special condition the records package cannot answer
- A status summary that does not reconcile to the underlying records
- AD compliance presented without the accomplishment evidence the export requires
- A modification relevant to the importing authority that is undocumented for export
What is at stake
A records gap discovered during the export process stalls the certificate and, with it, the delivery date the transaction is built around. An importing-authority special condition that the records cannot answer forces additional compliance work under time pressure, and an export application that goes back for missing evidence loses the delivery slot and the leverage that came with it.
Move from findings to resolution
Move from findings to a documented resolution path.
How the work runs
Assemble the summaries
Build the AD, life-limited, and configuration status summaries the export requires.
Map the special conditions
Test the importing authority's conditions against the evidence in the package.
Reconcile to source
Confirm each summary ties back to the underlying records that support it.
List the gaps
Flag missing or non-conforming evidence and order it by what would stall the certificate.
What the buyer receives
- An exception list of missing or non-conforming export evidence
- A source map from each status summary to the records behind it
- A closure plan ordered by which gaps would stall the certificate first
Who uses the output
- Records teams assembling the export package before the certificate is sought
- Asset managers protecting the delivery date a cross-border sale depends on
- CAMO leads reconciling status summaries to the records the authorities will test
How the work fits into the transaction or program
The export-airworthiness review sits at the border crossing of a transaction, pulling together the AD, life-limited, configuration, and repair evidence the other reviews produced into a package two authorities will test. Its exception list drives the remediation that has to close before the application goes in, so gaps surface before the certificate rather than during it.
Aircraft-specific considerations
CRJ tails are traded internationally across their long service lives, so an aircraft coming up for export has usually passed through several registers, and the records reflect the requirements of each rather than the importing authority ahead. High-cycle regional utilization means the aging-structure and life-limited status the importing authority scrutinizes is well advanced, so those summaries carry the most weight and the most likely gaps in the export package.
Jurisdiction-specific considerations
The exporting and importing authorities apply different acceptance criteria, so an FAA export certificate for a CRJ does not by itself satisfy an EASA importing review or the reverse, and the review maps the importing authority's special conditions against the package rather than assuming a certificate from one authority carries to the other.
Regulatory limits
The review assembles and tests the export evidence and identifies what is missing or non-conforming. It does not issue an export certificate of airworthiness, bind either authority, or determine that the aircraft is airworthy.
What this review does not cover
- Issuing or applying for the export certificate of airworthiness
- Performing maintenance to close an importing-authority condition
- Any airworthiness determination on the aircraft
Specific to this review
- An export package has to satisfy two authorities with different criteria, so evidence that closed a domestic review can still be non-conforming for the importing side.
- Importing-authority special conditions are where CRJ exports most often stall, because they demand compliance the file was never organized to show.
- A status summary is only export-ready if it reconciles to the underlying records, since the exporting authority tests the summary against the evidence, not on its face.
Sources
U.S. Government (eCFR). Export airworthiness approval requirements and special requirements of an importing authority.
U.S. Government (eCFR). Records an owner or operator must keep, including total time in service, current status of life-limited parts, and AD compliance.
European Union / EASA. EASA design and production certification, STCs, ETSO authorizations, and EASA Form 1 release.
International Civil Aviation Organization. International standards for the airworthiness of aircraft and the framework states use for type and continuing airworthiness.
European Union / EASA. Continuing airworthiness, maintenance records, CAMO responsibilities, and the airworthiness review process in the EASA system.
Frequently asked questions
We hold a current domestic airworthiness certificate. Isn't the export package straightforward?
A domestic certificate shows the aircraft met the exporting authority's requirements, but the importing authority applies its own special conditions, and those often demand evidence the file was not organized to present. The review tests the package against both sides so the gaps surface before the export application rather than during it.
Relevant glossary terms
Related pages
Where this fits
Talk to an engineer who has done this work
We will walk through your current state, the records or evidence involved, and a scoped first engagement.
Talk through the aircraft, records, evidence, deadline, and next useful step.