Bombardier Global 7500 export-airworthiness records review

When this review is needed

• The aircraft is being sold across a border and the buyer's authority has published its own import conditions.
• A re-registration is planned and the export certificate has to be issued against a clean status position.
• The importing authority requires specific AD or modification evidence that the current file may not present in its form.
• A prior export attempt stalled on documentation and the seller wants the gaps identified before reopening it.

The problem

An export package is judged by rules the seller does not write. The importing authority sets special conditions, and its acceptance turns on how the AD position, modification status, and life-limited part evidence are presented, not just on whether the work was done. A Global 7500 assembled under one authority's expectations can hold every record and still fail import because a status summary is not in the form the receiving side accepts.

What gets reviewed

• The export application and export certificate of airworthiness against the destination requirement
• The importing authority's special conditions mapped to the records that satisfy each one
• AD compliance status presented in the form the receiving authority will accept
• Modification and STC status reconciled to approvals the destination will recognize
• Life-limited part status and traceability packaged for the import review
• Status summaries reconciled to the source records that support them

What gets validated

• Each of the importing authority's special conditions maps to a specific document in the package
• AD status is expressed against the standard the destination applies, not only the exporting one
• Modifications carry approvals the receiving authority recognizes or an accepted basis for them
• LLP status and back-to-birth trace are complete for the parts the import review will sample
• Every status summary in the package reconciles to the underlying record it summarizes

Evidence normally required

• The export application and any draft export certificate of airworthiness
• The importing authority's published import and special-condition requirements
• Current AD, SB, and modification status reports
• LLP status list with supporting release certificates
• The status summaries prepared for the receiving side

Common discrepancies

• A special condition from the importing authority with no matching evidence in the package
• An AD position expressed only against the exporting authority's basis
• A modification approved under one authority without a recognized basis for the destination
• A status summary that does not reconcile to the release records behind it

What is at stake

A gap discovered by the importing authority stops the aircraft at the border, with the export certificate held and the transaction on hold until the evidence is reworked. Because the receiving authority sets the standard, that rework happens on its timeline rather than the seller's, and a delayed re-registration can put the whole sale window at risk.

How the work runs

What the buyer receives

• An exception list of the gaps that would stall the import, ranked by effect on the timeline
• A source map linking each import requirement to the record that satisfies it
• A closure plan scoped to the destination authority and this serial number

Who uses the output

• Asset managers protecting the transaction window against a border hold
• Records teams assembling the package the importing authority will actually review
• Continuing-airworthiness staff re-basing status evidence for the receiving system

How the work fits into the transaction or program

The export review runs after the airworthiness and status records are settled and before the export certificate is issued, translating a clean domestic file into the form the destination will accept. Its closure plan feeds the transaction schedule directly, since the import review is usually the last gate before the aircraft changes register.

Aircraft-specific considerations

As a recent ultra-long-range type, the Global 7500 carries engine and APU release evidence and cabin-system modifications that an importing authority may want to see substantiated against approvals it recognizes. Many of these tails have moved through management providers whose export documentation practices differ, so the package assembled at the point of export often needs to be normalized before the receiving authority sees it.

Jurisdiction-specific considerations

Export between an FAA register and an EASA state turns on bilateral recognition and each side's export and import procedures, so the same aircraft is packaged differently depending on direction. The review scopes the evidence to the specific origin and destination rather than a general export template.

Regulatory limits

The review checks whether the package will meet the importing authority's documented expectations. It does not issue the export certificate of airworthiness, bind the receiving authority to accept the aircraft, or make an airworthiness determination for either register.

What this review does not cover

• Issuing or endorsing the export certificate of airworthiness
• Negotiating or waiving the importing authority's special conditions
• Physical export inspection of the aircraft

Specific to this review

• Export acceptance turns on presentation as much as substance: the same AD work can pass or fail depending on whether it is expressed against the destination's basis.
• The importing authority sets the standard and the timeline, so a gap found at the border is closed on its schedule, not the seller's.
• Status summaries are where import reviews most often break, because a summary that does not reconcile to its source record undermines the whole package.

Sources

Frequently asked questions

Relevant glossary terms

Related pages

Where this fits