Skip to content

Equipment & Avionics Certification

Standards

The standards behind certification evidence and how compliance is demonstrated.

Page 2 of 3 ยท 121 published pages

DO-254 hardware assurance evidence support for sensor systemsSensor hardware evidence must tie requirements, calibration, and verification to its DAL. Get a DO-254 map with every gap listed before yourDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for flight-deck equipmentA flight-deck unit qualified to the wrong DO-160G categories fails installation review. We tie each declared category to its test report andDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for navigation equipmentNavigation units draw hard questions on HIRF and lightning sections. We match each DO-160G category you declare to its test report and flag DO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for surveillance equipmentTransponder and ADS-B qualification must match the installation and antenna. We reconcile each DO-160G category to its test report and hand DO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for communication equipmentRadio DO-160G qualification turns on details: power input, voltage spikes, audio susceptibility. We pair each category with its test evidencDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for display systemsDisplay units answer for the crew environment: thermal, humidity, sand and dust. We map each category to its DO-160G section and test reportDO-160G environmental qualification evidence support for sensor systemsVibration, fluids, icing: confirm the sensor unit's DO-160G qualification matches its exposed install. Get a category-by-category map to eacARP4754B development assurance evidence review for flight-deck equipmentFlight-deck equipment draws hard questions on requirement flow. We map every ARP4754B objective to the evidence that answers it and list gapARP4754B development assurance evidence review for navigation equipmentSensor inputs, database currency, software trace: an ARP4754B review lining each objective up with your navigation evidence. Get the gap lisARP4754B development assurance evidence review for surveillance equipmentTransponder and ADS-B packages stall on requirement trace, not test data. We connect each ARP4754B objective to your surveillance evidence aARP4754B development assurance evidence review for communication equipmentRadio performance, antenna, and electrical-load requirements all have to trace. An ARP4754B map ties each objective to your communication evARP4754B development assurance evidence review for display systemsSoftware lifecycle data and human-factors assumptions get probed first on displays. We place each ARP4754B objective against your evidence aARP4754B development assurance evidence review for sensor systemsCalibration evidence, installation effects, requirement trace: a review tying every ARP4754B objective to your sensor evidence. Know the gapARP4761A safety assessment evidence review for flight-deck equipmentHazard classification and failure analysis on flight-deck equipment get read closely. We map each ARP4761A objective to your evidence and shARP4761A safety assessment evidence review for navigation equipmentMisleading-information hazards sink navigation submittals. Check failure analysis and requirement trace against every ARP4761A objective, wiARP4761A safety assessment evidence review for surveillance equipmentTransponder and ADS-B hazard classifications face scrutiny. An ARP4761A map ties each objective to your surveillance evidence. See what reviARP4761A safety assessment evidence review for communication equipmentLoss-of-communication hazards need classification, failure analysis, and trace that agree. We map ARP4761A objectives to your comm evidence ARP4761A safety-assessment evidence support for display systemsFDAL allocation, failure conditions, software lifecycle links: check your display system's safety evidence against each ARP4761A objective bARP4761A safety-assessment evidence support for sensor systemsErroneous output decides a sensor's safety argument. Map calibration trace and installation effects to each ARP4761A objective before the reDO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for flight-deck equipmentData loading interfaces can put flight-deck equipment inside the aircraft security perimeter. Map threat conditions and scope to DO-326A objDO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for navigation equipmentNavigation database updates are a security chain. We map update integrity and position-data threats to each DO-326A objective, interface by DO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for surveillance equipmentTransponder and ADS-B evidence gets probed on the RF and datalink attack surface. We map your artifacts to each DO-326A objective and flag uDO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for communication equipmentDatalink, voice, and connectivity widen a comm unit's attack surface. Get a DO-326A evidence map showing which threat conditions your integrDO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for display systemsA spoofed symbol reaching the crew is the threat reviewers press on. We map your display's DO-326A evidence to the data paths feeding it, beDO-326A airworthiness security evidence support for sensor systemsMaintenance access and calibration tampering top the DO-326A threat list for sensors. Our evidence map ties each objective to your configuraTSO compliance evidence support for flight-deck equipmentFlight-deck TSO packages stumble on the article versus installation boundary. We map your evidence to the minimum performance standard, deviTSO compliance evidence support for navigation equipmentFunctional class, accuracy, and the software level behind them: your navigation TSO evidence must line up. We map each claim to its performaTSO compliance evidence support for surveillance equipmentA finding on a transponder or ADS-B article stalls the authorization. Our TSO evidence map links every surveillance claim to its report and TSO compliance evidence support for communication equipmentRadio TSO packages fail when performance, antenna, or electrical load claims point at no report. We tie each claim to DO-160G evidence beforTSO compliance evidence support for display systemsDisplay TSO submittals turn on DO-178C data and human-factors assumptions holding together. We map both to your qualification artifacts and TSO compliance evidence support for sensor systemsSensor TSO evidence spans requirements trace, calibration, and installation effects. Our map ties each accuracy claim to its artifact, ARP47ETSO compliance evidence support for flight-deck equipmentEuropean authorization arranges evidence differently than your TSO file. We restructure flight-deck evidence, human interface to DO-160G, toETSO compliance evidence support for navigation equipmentMOPS alignment, database currency, software level: your navigation ETSO file is checked on all three. We map each claim to its artifact aheaETSO compliance evidence support for surveillance equipmentTransponder, ADS-B, and antenna substantiation must fit the European structure, not mirror a TSO file. Get an ETSO evidence map tying each cETSO compliance evidence support for communication equipmentA radio ETSO file covers performance, antenna, electrical load, and DO-160G qualification. We align each claim to its evidence and list whatETSO compliance evidence support for display systemsDisplay ETSO reviews weigh DO-178C software data against human-factors assumptions. We arrange both for the European structure and flag the ETSO compliance evidence support for sensor systemsHeading into an ETSO submittal? We arrange your sensor's requirements trace, calibration, ARP4754B and DO-160G evidence into one European maPart 23 certification basis support for flight-deck equipmentFlight-deck equipment on a normal-category aircraft? We tie crew interface, display behavior, and install assumptions to the Part 23 basis. Part 23 certification basis support for navigation equipmentWhich Part 23 paragraphs apply to your navigation equipment, and what answers them? We link sensor inputs, database currency, software levelPart 23 certification basis support for surveillance equipmentFor Part 23 surveillance equipment, the install carries the burden of proof. We map transponder, ADS-B, and antenna substantiation to the baPart 23 certification basis support for communication equipmentBench data alone will not close a Part 23 communication basis. We map radio performance, antenna install, electrical load, and qualificationPart 23 certification basis support for display systemsA display that flies well can still miss its Part 23 basis. We reconcile software level, human-factors assumptions, and DO-160G data with whPart 23 certification basis support for sensor systemsCalibration and installation effects are where Part 23 sensor questions start. We trace requirements, calibration, and qualification to the Part 25 certification basis support for flight-deck equipmentMoving equipment onto a transport flight deck? We match crew interface, display behavior, and installation assumptions to the Part 25 paragrPart 25 certification basis support for navigation equipmentRedundancy is where transport navigation cases get hard. We map sensor inputs, database currency, and MOPS alignment to your Part 25 basis, Part 25 certification basis support for surveillance equipmentADS-B and transponder installs get a close look on transports. We align antenna and install substantiation with your Part 25 basis. See whatPart 25 certification basis support for communication equipmentAntenna coexistence and electrical load raise the hard questions on transport radios. We map them, plus performance and qualification, to yoPart 25 certification-basis support for a transport display systemMap your transport display system to its Part 25 basis before submittal: software life-cycle data, human-factors assumptions, and DO-160G, ePart 25 certification-basis support for a transport sensor systemAnswering a finding on a transport sensor system? We tie requirements trace, calibration, and install effects to the Part 25 basis so your rPart 27 certification-basis support for normal-category rotorcraft flight-deck equipmentRotorcraft flight decks answer to Part 27, not fixed-wing rules. We map display behavior, crew interface, and install assumptions to each paPart 27 certification-basis support for rotorcraft navigation equipmentRotorcraft navigation has two yardsticks: the Part 27 basis and the MOPS. We map database currency, software level, and sensor inputs to botPart 27 certification-basis support for rotorcraft surveillance equipmentYour rotorcraft transponder and ADS-B install needs a Part 27 story: performance, antenna placement, substantiation. Get a paragraph-level ePart 27 certification-basis support for rotorcraft communication equipmentRadio performance, antenna install, electrical load, DO-160G: see where your rotorcraft comm equipment stands against each Part 27 paragraphPart 27 certification-basis support for a rotorcraft display systemA rotorcraft display touches DO-178C data, human factors, and DO-160G at once. We map every Part 27 paragraph to its evidence and flag what Part 27 certification-basis support for a rotorcraft sensor systemRequirements trace, calibration, installation effects: Part 27 sensor packages fail on the quiet items. Get a standards map with each paragrPart 29 certification-basis support for transport rotorcraft flight-deck equipmentCrew interface, display behavior, DO-160G, installation assumptions: align transport rotorcraft flight-deck equipment to its Part 29 basis wPart 29 certification-basis support for transport rotorcraft navigation equipmentBefore your transport rotorcraft nav submittal, tie sensor inputs, database currency, and software level to each Part 29 paragraph and MOPS Part 29 certification basis mapping for surveillance equipmentTransponder, ADS-B, and antenna substantiation for transport rotorcraft: map each applicable Part 29 rule to the evidence that satisfies it Part 29 certification basis mapping for communication radiosA finding on your rotorcraft radio install? Pair each Part 29 communication rule with performance, antenna, and electrical-load evidence, anPart 29 certification basis mapping for display systemsDisplay software, human factors, environmental data: connect each Part 29 display rule to its DO-178C and DO-160G evidence and spot the gaps