Export airworthiness
Boeing 777 family export airworthiness documentation records review
This review assembles and checks the records that support an export airworthiness certificate for a specific Boeing 777, and tests the aircraft against the importing authority's special conditions. It is run for a seller, lessor, or manager moving a widebody across borders who needs the export evidence ready before the certificate is applied for. The work confirms status summaries, AD and SB positions, and modification evidence line up with what the importing authority will require, and it surfaces gaps early enough to fix. You receive a structured export evidence package, a supported exception list against the importing requirements, and a closure plan for this tail.
When this review is needed
- A 777 is being sold or delivered across borders and the export certificate application is being prepared.
- The importing authority has issued special conditions that must be met and evidenced before acceptance.
- The aircraft is transferring from an FAA to an EASA register, or the reverse, and the records must satisfy the receiving authority.
- A delivery date is fixed and the export package needs its gaps found before the exporting authority reviews it.
The problem
Export packages fail on detail, not on big questions. The status summary is a month old by the time it is submitted, an AD required by the importing authority sits at a lower method of compliance than that state accepts, or a modification that is routine on the exporting register lacks the substantiation the receiving authority wants. On a 777 with a long international history, the special conditions from one importing authority collide with the way the aircraft has been maintained under another, and the seller learns this at the worst possible time.
What gets reviewed
- Export certificate application assembled against the exporting authority's requirements
- Importing-authority special conditions mapped to the evidence that satisfies each one
- AD and SB status summarized to the standard the receiving authority requires
- Modification and repair substantiation checked for acceptance on the receiving register
- Status summaries for time, cycles, LLP, and life-limited components dated to the export point
- Records language, format, and completeness checked against the importing authority's expectations
Scope this review
Tell us the asset, the event, and the evidence in scope, and we will outline a focused first engagement.
Send a representative, redacted record set and we will scope the review.
What gets validated
- Each importing special condition maps to specific evidence in the package, not a general statement
- AD positions meet the method of compliance the receiving authority accepts, matching its terms and not merely the exporting register's
- Status summaries are dated to the export point and agree with the underlying records
- Modifications carry substantiation the receiving register will accept
- The package is complete and legible in the form the importing authority expects
Evidence normally required
- The exporting authority's export airworthiness requirements for the type
- The importing authority's special conditions and acceptance requirements
- Current AD and SB status reports and LLP status for the serial number
- Modification, repair, and STC substantiation relevant to the receiving register
- Current time and cycle status and the aircraft's export configuration
Common discrepancies
- An AD accepted on the exporting register at a method of compliance the importing authority will not take
- Status summaries dated well before the intended export point
- A modification routine on the exporting register lacking substantiation the receiving authority requires
- Special conditions with no mapped evidence, left to be resolved during the authority's review
What is at stake
An export package that reaches the authority with gaps slips the delivery, and every slipped delivery on a widebody carries daily cost and contractual exposure. If a special condition cannot be met from existing records, the aircraft may need physical work or fresh substantiation before it can be accepted, turning a documentation gap into an operational delay measured in weeks.
Move from findings to resolution
Move from findings to a documented resolution path.
How the work runs
Read both authorities' requirements
Set out the exporting requirements and the importing special conditions as the checklist the package must satisfy.
Map evidence to conditions
Tie each requirement and special condition to specific records and date the status summaries to the export point.
Find the acceptance gaps
Flag AD methods, modifications, and summaries that will not be accepted on the receiving register.
Assemble and sequence
Deliver the ordered export package and a closure plan against the delivery date.
What the buyer receives
- A structured export evidence package organized to the importing authority's requirements
- A supported exception list mapping each unmet special condition to what it needs
- A closure plan sequencing the missing evidence against the delivery date
Who uses the output
- Asset managers and sellers driving the export toward a fixed delivery date
- Records teams assembling the package to the receiving authority's format
- Continuing-airworthiness staff resolving special conditions before submission
How the work fits into the transaction or program
The export review pulls together the outputs of the AD-status, LLP, and repair reviews into a single package the authority will accept. It sits near the end of the records workflow, because it depends on those upstream checks being settled, and its exception list feeds the last round of remediation before the certificate is applied for.
Aircraft-specific considerations
A 777 records review turns on careful engine-module trace, structural-repair history, ETOPS-related evidence, and heavy-check work-package closure. For export, the ETOPS approval and its supporting configuration often draw specific attention from a receiving authority, so the review confirms the ETOPS evidence for this serial number is complete and framed the way the importing state will expect.
Regulatory limits
This review prepares and checks the records that support an export application. It does not issue an export certificate of airworthiness, make an airworthiness determination, or bind either authority to accept the package. The certificate remains the exporting authority's to grant.
What this review does not cover
- Issue of the export certificate of airworthiness or any authority approval
- Physical work to satisfy an importing special condition
- Preparation of new modification or repair substantiation data
Specific to this review
- Export packages usually fail on method-of-compliance mismatches, where an AD accepted on one register does not meet the importing state's terms.
- Status summaries go stale fast: a summary dated even a few weeks before export can force a re-run just before submission.
- On a 777, ETOPS configuration is a frequent special-condition focus, so the review frames that evidence for the receiving authority ahead of time.
Sources
U.S. Government (eCFR). Export airworthiness approval requirements and special requirements of an importing authority.
U.S. Government (eCFR). Records an owner or operator must keep, including total time in service, current status of life-limited parts, and AD compliance.
European Union / EASA. EASA design and production certification, STCs, ETSO authorizations, and EASA Form 1 release.
International Civil Aviation Organization. International standards for the airworthiness of aircraft and the framework states use for type and continuing airworthiness.
European Union / EASA. Continuing airworthiness, maintenance records, CAMO responsibilities, and the airworthiness review process in the EASA system.
Frequently asked questions
Can this get the export certificate issued?
No. The exporting authority issues the certificate. This review prepares and checks the supporting records so the application is complete and the importing authority's special conditions are evidenced, which reduces the risk of the authority returning the package with findings.
Relevant glossary terms
Related pages
Where this fits
Talk to an engineer who has done this work
We will walk through your current state, the records or evidence involved, and a scoped first engagement.
Talk through the aircraft, records, evidence, deadline, and next useful step.