Equipment list & configuration
Embraer E-Jet equipment-list records review
This review confirms that the aircraft equipment list for an Embraer E-Jet reflects what is installed and that each installed item is supported by an installation record, a release certificate, and a modification approval where the change requires one. It is run before a transaction or after a configuration change, when the equipment list is the record a buyer reads to know what is fitted. It checks that listed items trace to their release paperwork, that installations carry an approval basis, and that removals were reflected. You receive an exception list of unsupported or stale entries, a source map to the installation and release records, and a plan to reconcile the list.
When this review is needed
- An E-Jet is being sold and the equipment list is the record the buyer reads to confirm what is fitted.
- A configuration change added or removed equipment and the list has to reflect it with supporting records.
- An installed item is on the list and its release certificate or installation record has to be produced.
- The list was inherited from a prior operator and no one has confirmed the entries against the paperwork.
The problem
An equipment list is a snapshot that stops being true the moment a change is not carried into it. An item is removed but stays on the list; a replacement is installed but its release certificate never made it into the file; a change embodied under a modification is listed as equipment without a reference to the approval behind it. On an E-Jet reconfigured across operators, the list can name items that are gone and omit items that are fitted, and every entry is trusted as installed until someone asks for the paperwork.
What gets reviewed
- Listed equipment reconciled against what the installation records show as fitted
- Release certificates located for the installed items that require them
- Installation records confirming each item entered service against an approval basis
- Modification-embodied items on the list traced to their approval rather than treated as routine
- Removals reflected so the list does not carry items no longer fitted
- Serial numbers on the list reconciled to the installation and release records
Scope this review
Tell us the asset, the event, and the evidence in scope, and we will outline a focused first engagement.
Send a representative, redacted record set and we will scope the review.
What gets validated
- Each installed item on the list has a release certificate appropriate to it
- Installation records support each item's entry into service against an approval basis
- Items embodied under a modification reference the approval rather than a bare equipment line
- Removed items are absent from the current list rather than carried stale
- Serial numbers on the list match the installation and release records
Evidence normally required
- The current aircraft equipment list and configuration records
- Release certificates for installed items
- Installation records for the fitted equipment
- Modification approvals for items embodied under a change
- Removal records for items no longer fitted
Common discrepancies
- An item on the equipment list with no release certificate in the file
- A removed item still carried on the current list
- A modification-embodied item listed as routine equipment with no approval reference
- A serial number on the list that does not match the installation record
What is at stake
An item on the list without a release certificate cannot be shown to have entered service legitimately, which the buyer treats as a discount or a hold. A removed item still listed misrepresents the configuration and can drag a weight-and-balance or an AD applicability along with it. A modification-embodied item listed as routine equipment hides the approval question until the reference is checked, usually mid-diligence when the leverage has moved to the buyer.
Move from findings to resolution
Move from findings to a documented resolution path.
How the work runs
Reconcile list to fitted
Compare the equipment list against the installation records to find stale and missing entries.
Locate the release
Confirm each installed item has a release certificate appropriate to the register.
Check the approval basis
Trace modification-embodied items to their approval rather than a bare equipment line.
Flag the exceptions
List unsupported, stale, or mis-referenced entries and map each to its source.
What the buyer receives
- An exception list of unsupported, stale, or mis-referenced equipment entries
- A source map tying each listed item to its installation and release records
- A plan to reconcile the list, locating release paperwork and clearing stale entries
Who uses the output
- Asset managers confirming the equipment the aircraft is priced on is actually supported
- Records teams reconciling the list to the installation and release records
- Continuing-airworthiness teams relying on the configuration the list asserts
How the work fits into the transaction or program
The equipment-list review connects the modification review and the weight-and-balance review, because an installed item is both a configuration change and a mass the statement should carry. It runs before a transaction or after a change, and its exceptions feed the work of locating release paperwork and clearing stale entries before the list is relied on as the record of what is fitted.
Aircraft-specific considerations
E-Jets carry cabin and avionics fits that vary widely between operators, so the equipment list is longer and changes more often than on a fleet with a fixed configuration. Avionics line-replaceable units in particular are swapped on condition, and each swap should update the serial number and carry its release certificate, so the review treats the avionics section of the list as the area most likely to hold a stale serial or a missing release.
Jurisdiction-specific considerations
A release certificate acceptable on one register may not be accepted on another, so an item released on an FAA Form 8130-3 and an item released on an EASA Form 1 are read against the register the aircraft is moving to. The review flags items whose release paperwork will need a dual release or a further step to be accepted after a transfer.
Regulatory limits
The review confirms the list is supported by installation and release records and reconciles to the configuration. It does not install or remove equipment, issue a release certificate, or determine that the installed equipment is airworthy.
What this review does not cover
- Physical inspection to confirm what is installed on the aircraft
- Issuing a release certificate or approving an installation
- Any airworthiness determination on the installed equipment
Specific to this review
- An equipment list stops being true silently: a removed item stays listed and a new item goes unlisted, and neither shows as an error on the list itself.
- A release certificate is register-specific, so an item legitimately released in its origin system can still need a further step to be accepted after a transfer.
- Avionics line-replaceable units are the most common source of a stale serial, because they are swapped on condition without always updating the list.
- A modification-embodied item listed as routine equipment hides the approval question until the reference is checked, which usually happens mid-diligence when leverage has moved to the buyer.
- E-Jets carry cabin and avionics fits that vary widely between operators, so the equipment list is longer and changes more often than on a fixed-configuration fleet.
Sources
U.S. Government (eCFR). Maintenance recordkeeping content and approval-for-return-to-service requirements, including 43.9, 43.11, and Appendix B.
Federal Aviation Administration. Completion and use of FAA Form 8130-3, Authorized Release Certificate, for new and used parts.
European Union / EASA. Continuing airworthiness, maintenance records, CAMO responsibilities, and the airworthiness review process in the EASA system.
U.S. Government (eCFR). Records an owner or operator must keep, including total time in service, current status of life-limited parts, and AD compliance.
Frequently asked questions
An item is on the list. Doesn't that mean it is installed and approved?
The list asserts an item is fitted, but the review confirms it against the installation record, its release certificate, and, where a modification embodied it, the approval behind it. Lists carry removed items and omit new ones without looking wrong, so each entry is checked against the paperwork rather than taken as installed.
Relevant glossary terms
Related pages
Where this fits
Talk to an engineer who has done this work
We will walk through your current state, the records or evidence involved, and a scoped first engagement.
Talk through the aircraft, records, evidence, deadline, and next useful step.