Skip to content

Equipment & Avionics Certification

Evidence & deliverables

Certification evidence sets, what they must show, and how they are reviewed.

Page 3 of 3 ยท 168 published pages

Compliance-matrix evidence review for software assurance teamsA compliance matrix citing evidence that moved or changed sinks a software submittal. We verify each entry is live and list the stale ones bCertification-plan evidence review for software assurance teamsA PSAC promising coverage your data cannot deliver sets up findings. We check basis, affected areas, and commitments and list each promise yMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for software assurance teamsEvery requirement with an assigned means needs a route to real evidence. We walk your software compliance map end to end and flag each requiRequirements-trace evidence review for software assurance teamsDO-178C reviewers pull the trace both ways. We audit requirement, design, and verification links and report each break and the direction it Verification-trace evidence review for software assurance teamsVerified means proven. We check test, analysis, inspection, or review evidence behind each verified requirement and flag what is missing, paDO-160 qualification report evidence review for software assurance teamsA DO-160G report can pass every test and still miss your installation. We check categories and limits and hand your software team a gap listDO-178C software data evidence review for software assurance teamsBefore lifecycle data reaches the authority: an independent read of plans, verification records, and the accomplishment summary, gaps rankedDO-254 hardware data evidence review for software assurance teamsYour DO-254 package: plans, design data, verification, and configuration records checked against the assigned DAL, each objective gap rankedSafety assessment evidence review for software assurance teamsFHA, PSSA, and SSA read against ARP4761A: we trace safety results to requirements and flag every failure condition that does not close. Get Configuration management evidence review for software assurance teamsIf your evidence describes one configuration and your baselines another, review stalls. We check release records and flag artifacts not tiedConformity records evidence review for software assurance teamsConformity records hold when test article identity, configuration, and eligibility align. We flag articles not tied to a conformed build befICA package evidence review for software assurance teamsICA that drifts from the approved configuration surfaces late. We check maintenance tasks, limitations, and parts data and list each elementCompliance matrix evidence review for hardware assurance teamsA compliance matrix ages quietly: evidence gets superseded, claims stand. We check each entry's means of compliance and currency and list thCertification plan evidence review for hardware assurance teamsYour certification plan made commitments; your data package may not keep them. We compare basis and commitments against the evidence and lisMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for hardware teamsA means of compliance without an evidence path is a finding in waiting. We walk your requirement-to-evidence logic and name each requirementRequirements traceability evidence review for hardware teamsDerived and changed requirements are where traceability breaks. We check requirements against design and verification and hand you each stalVerification traceability evidence review for hardware assurance teamsMarked verified is not the same as evidenced. We trace closed requirements to test, analysis, inspection, or review records and list those wDO-160 qualification report evidence review for hardware assurance teamsThe report passed; the question is whether DO-160 categories match where the equipment will fly. We check limits and installation assumptionDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence reviewDoes the accomplishment summary claim more than the evidence shows? We check DO-178C plans and verification records against the software levDO-254 hardware data evidence review for hardware assurance teamsBefore a submittal or design-change assessment: DO-254 plans, design data, and verification checked against your DAL, gaps keyed to assurancSafety assessment evidence review for hardware assurance teamsFHA, PSSA, and SSA results that trace to nothing stall submittals. We walk your safety chain to requirements and verification, then hand youConfiguration management evidence review for hardware assurance teamsIf reviewers cannot tie your evidence to a baseline, findings follow. We check revisions and release records, then list each item without a Conformity records evidence review for hardware assurance teamsResults claimed on articles nobody can prove were conforming get challenged. We tie each article and installation to its configuration and fICA package evidence review for hardware assurance teamsAn ICA missing tasks, limitations, or parts data for the approved configuration stalls approval. Get the list of what your ICA does not coveCompliance matrix evidence review for qualification test teamsA matrix entry citing superseded evidence is coverage on paper only. We check every certification basis item and its cites, then give your tCertification plan evidence review for qualification test teamsPlan commitments your data package cannot meet surface at the worst moment. We reconcile plan against deliverables and key each gap to the cMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for qualification test teamsA declared means with no evidence behind it is a finding in waiting. We walk your MoC map requirement by requirement and flag every means laRequirements traceability review for qualification test teamsOrphaned and broken trace links surface during audit, not before. We align requirements, design, and verification for your test team and lisVerification traceability review for qualification test teamsRequirements marked verified without current evidence unravel under review. We audit test, analysis, and inspection closure and name each onDO-160 qualification report evidence review for qualification test teamsA DO-160G category that does not cover the installation invalidates the result. We compare test limits and categories to your installation aDO-178C software data evidence review for qualification test teamsObjectives owed at your software level are not optional. We review plans, verification records, and the SAS against the objective set, then DO-254 hardware data evidence review for qualification test teamsDO-254 findings start where assurance runs thin at the assigned DAL. We review hardware plans, design data, and verification and list where Safety assessment evidence review for qualification test teamsSafety conclusions no requirement supports are the orphans reviewers hunt. We trace FHA, PSSA, and SSA output for your qualification and lisConfiguration management evidence review for qualification test teamsEvidence credited to a superseded revision fails the baseline check. We reconcile your submitted data against the controlled configuration aConformity records evidence review for qualification test teamsA test result resting on a non-conforming article is one you cannot use. We verify each article traces to a controlled configuration and flaICA package evidence review for qualification test teamsTest configurations outrun manuals. We check ICA tasks, limitations, and parts data against the approved configuration and hand you the gap Compliance matrix evidence review for quality teamsEvery matrix row claims a finding. We verify each claim still resolves to evidence and flag the rows that are missing, stale, or mismatched Certification plan evidence review for quality teamsYour certification plan makes promises the data package must keep. We name each commitment the evidence cannot yet meet and each affected arMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for quality teamsA means-of-compliance map fails quietly: methods assigned with no evidence path. We check every requirement and name the ones left uncoveredRequirements traceability evidence review for quality teamsDerived and changed requirements are where traceability breaks. We audit your trace across design and verification and name each requirementVerification traceability evidence review for quality teamsMarked verified is not the same as proven. We check every closed requirement for real test, analysis, or review evidence and list the ones tDO-160 qualification report evidence review for quality teamsA DO-160 report can pass every test and still miss the installation. We compare tested categories to the real environment and name each one DO-178C software lifecycle data evidence review for quality teamsA software level is a bar, not a grade. We read your DO-178C plans, verification data, and accomplishment summary and name each objective unDO-254 hardware lifecycle data evidence review for quality teamsDO-254 findings land where hardware evidence runs thin. We review plans, design data, and verification against the assigned DAL and list eacSafety assessment evidence review for quality teamsFHA, PSSA, and SSA results that never close to a requirement draw findings. We trace your safety assessment to requirements and verificationConfiguration management data evidence review for quality teamsData that drifted from the released baseline is a finding waiting to happen. We check every artifact revision against the controlled baselinConformity records evidence review for quality teamsIf a test article cannot trace to a controlled build, its results are arguable. We review your conformity records and name each item whose tICA package evidence review for quality teamsBefore quality signs the ICA package, be sure tasks, limitations, and parts data track the approved configuration. We deliver the gap list,