Skip to content

Equipment & Avionics Certification

Evidence & deliverables

Certification evidence sets, what they must show, and how they are reviewed.

Page 2 of 3 ยท 168 published pages

Verification-traceability review for certification evidenceA requirement without current verification evidence is an open finding. We trace each one to its method and result and flag any passed statuConfiguration-management evidence review for avionics and equipment suppliersIf your baselines cannot name the exact build the certification data describes, submittal stalls. Get a reconciled configuration index, entrQuality-assurance records review for avionics and equipment suppliersAuditors do not take process compliance on faith. We review audit results, process records, and corrective actions to show the process ran aTool-qualification evidence review for avionics and equipment suppliersTool credit without qualification at the right level is a finding waiting to happen. Get a tool register: claimed credit, DO-330 level, and Compliance-checklist review for avionics and equipment suppliersA checklist of green statuses means little if the evidence behind them is thin. We verify every objective and return your checklist annotateIndependent certification-plan review for avionics and equipment suppliersYour plan commits the basis, standards, and assurance levels. Get an independent read of the PSAC before the authority sees it, weak commitmAccomplishment-summary review for avionics and equipment suppliersYour SAS or HAS says the program is done. We check it against the plan it answers and the evidence you actually hold, so gaps surface beforeQualification-test-report review for avionics and equipment suppliersA DO-160 report that skips a category or drifts from the test plan stalls the submittal. We check coverage and traceability against the artiCompliance-matrix review when one matrix carries both an FAA and an EASA basisOne matrix, two authorities. We read your FAA and EASA columns for method adequacy and alignment, and return an annotated matrix with every Conformity-records review for the articles a certification test relied onA test report is only as strong as the article behind it. Get a record-by-record verdict on each conformity inspection record before you relICA package review for the instructions an installed article must carryMissing limitations or untraceable tasks surface in service, where they cost most. Get each ICA section checked for completeness and task deFinding and action-item register review before a program closes its open itemsItems closed without real evidence reopen at audit. We reconcile your finding and action-item register: each closure confirmed, or reopened Compliance matrix evidence review for avionics suppliersAn avionics compliance matrix with stale evidence fails quietly. We review coverage, means of compliance, and currency before submittal, ranCertification plan evidence review for avionics suppliersAn avionics certification plan that promises data the package lacks draws findings. We compare basis, affected areas, and commitments, then Means-of-compliance map evidence review for avionics suppliersA method on paper is not evidence in hand. We walk your means-of-compliance map requirement by requirement and list every chain that does noRequirements trace evidence review for avionics suppliersA requirements trace with broken links stalls avionics reviews. We follow each requirement through design and verification, flag derived oneVerification traceability evidence review for avionics suppliersA verified mark is worth only the evidence behind it. We audit your avionics verification traceability and name every requirement whose prooDO-160 qualification report evidence review for avionics suppliersDO-160 test levels that miss the installation environment surface late. We check every tested category, section, and assumption against wherDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence review for avionics suppliersDO-178C objectives slip when independence runs thin. We review your lifecycle data against the assigned software level and name every objectDO-254 hardware lifecycle data evidence review for avionics suppliersIs your DO-254 hardware evidence complete at the assigned DAL? We audit your lifecycle data and name each gap: missing, stale, or at the wroSafety assessment evidence review for avionics suppliersFHA, PSSA, and SSA must reconcile and trace into requirements. We review avionics safety evidence and name each break between stages before Configuration management data evidence review for avionics suppliersSubmitted evidence that disagrees with your baselines draws findings. We reconcile avionics release records and indexes, then list every entConformity records evidence review for avionics suppliersA test result is only as good as the article behind it. We check avionics conformity records for identity and eligibility, and flag every reInstructions for continued airworthiness evidence review for avionics suppliersAvionics design changes outpace manuals fast. We compare your ICA tasks, limitations, and part numbers to the approved configuration and lisCompliance matrix evidence review for equipment suppliersOne stale citation can undo a compliance claim. We review your equipment compliance matrix for basis coverage and evidence that still holds,Certification plan evidence review for equipment suppliersCertification plans age faster than programs admit. We check your equipment plan's basis, scope, and commitments against what you deliver, aMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for equipment suppliersA method with no artifact behind it is a promise, not compliance. We trace your means-of-compliance map to real evidence paths and flag eachRequirements traceability evidence review for equipment suppliersTraceability looks complete until someone pulls a thread. We follow each equipment requirement to design and verification, then list every oVerification traceability evidence review for equipment suppliersRequirements marked complete without test, analysis, or inspection evidence fail review. We check the proof behind every closure and name eaDO-160 qualification report evidence review for equipment suppliersA DO-160 report at the wrong category leaves your installation exposed. We map test levels to the intended environment and list each conditiDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence review for equipment suppliersDoes your lifecycle data back the accomplishment summary? We audit plans and verification records against the assigned level and list each uDO-254 hardware lifecycle data evidence review for equipment suppliersDAL shortfalls hide in hardware data until the audit. We review DO-254 plans, design data, and verification for your FPGA or ASIC and name eSafety assessment evidence review for equipment suppliersFHA, PSSA, and SSA drift apart over a long program. We cross-check your equipment safety set for classification conflicts and list each unclConfiguration management data evidence review for equipment suppliersTest data from one baseline, submittal from another: reviewers notice. We audit equipment configuration records against the controlled buildConformity records evidence review for equipment suppliersWas each test article conformed and eligible when it ran? We audit equipment conformity records and list every result that does not tie to aInstructions for continued airworthiness evidence review for equipment suppliersEquipment supplier ICAs drift as the approved configuration moves. We check tasks, limitations, and parts data for coverage and currency, thCompliance matrix evidence review for aircraft modifiersYour STC compliance matrix was true the day you wrote it. We reread each row against its cited evidence and flag unsupported means and staleCertification plan evidence review for aircraft modifiersYour certification plan promises a basis, affected areas, and compliance data. We test each commitment against the package you can deliver aMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for aircraft modifiersA method assigned is not evidence delivered. We walk your means-of-compliance map and flag each requirement whose evidence path is missing oRequirements traceability evidence review for aircraft modifiersDerived and changed requirements drop out of the chain quietly. We trace your set down to design and up to verification, then list broken anVerification traceability evidence review for aircraft modifiersMarked complete is not closed. We check each requirement against its test, analysis, inspection, or review results and flag closures the eviDO-160 qualification report evidence review for modifiersDO-160 results prove the categories you ran, not the installation you fly. We check tested categories, limits, and setup against the aircrafDO-178C software lifecycle data evidence review for modifiersWe read your DO-178C plans, verification records, and accomplishment summary against the assigned software level, then key each gap to the oDO-254 hardware lifecycle data evidence review for modifiersDO-254 data has to hold at the assigned DAL, not one level down. We review plans, design data, verification, and configuration records, thenSafety assessment evidence review for aircraft modifiersYour FHA, PSSA, and SSA must close back to requirements and the verification that meets them. We trace each hazard through the loop and handConfiguration management evidence review for aircraft modifiersEvidence that disagrees with the controlled baseline stalls a review. We check your configuration records and list each mismatch by artifactConformity records evidence review for aircraft modifiersOne untraceable test article can undo a clean campaign. We review your conformity records and flag each article or installation missing its Instructions for continued airworthiness evidence review for modifiersAn STC's ICA has to match the approved modification, not the drawing set you started from. We compare instructions, limitations, and parts, Compliance matrix evidence review for certification teamsBasis items lose their evidence as the design moves. We audit your team's compliance matrix and flag every row where the cited data no longeCertification plan evidence review for certification teamsYou sign the plan; the data package has to keep it. We check every commitment against what the package holds today and flag the ones it cannMeans-of-compliance map evidence review for certification teamsYour means-of-compliance map says everything is covered. Before submittal, we verify each assigned means resolves to real evidence and list Requirements traceability evidence review for certification teamsOrphaned requirements surface at the worst time: in front of the authority. Get a gap list of every broken, missing, or orphaned trace link Verification traceability evidence review for certification teamsA requirement marked complete with no result behind it is a finding waiting to happen. We check every closure and flag each one lacking subsDO-160 qualification report evidence review for certification teamsYour DO-160 report gets read against the claimed categories and the installation. We check the evidence chain the way a reviewer will, beforDO-178C software data evidence review for certification teamsLifecycle data that misses the assigned software level stalls a submittal. Get a gap list of each DO-178C objective your plans, standards, aDO-254 hardware data evidence review for certification teamsYour DO-254 package must hold up at the assigned DAL. We review plans, design data, and verification records and name each activity the evidSafety-assessment evidence review for certification teamsFHA, PSSA, and SSA results that do not trace to requirements and verification weaken the case. Get a gap list naming each unsupported claim Configuration management evidence review for certification teamsSubmitted evidence that does not match the controlled baseline invites findings. We check baselines, revisions, and release records, then naConformity-records evidence review for certification teamsA test on an unconformed article can be a test you run twice. We check article identity and build conformity and flag each test whose supporICA package evidence review for certification teamsAn ICA package that lags the approved design fails review on arrival. We reconcile maintenance tasks, limitations, and parts data and list e