Skip to content

Equipment & Avionics Certification

Certification workflows

TSO, STC, and approval workflows and the evidence each one requires.

Page 3 of 4 ยท 187 published pages

Requirements traceability support for an installation approvalDerived and changed requirements vanish from installation traces. Get a gap assessment of every broken or missing link before your package gVerification traceability support for installation approval packagesAn unmapped requirement invites findings at installation approval. We build a requirement-to-evidence map covering every line of the certifiDO-160G environmental qualification report support for installation approvalTest categories that miss the installed location sink DO-160G reports. We check every category and test limit against the environment the arDO-178C software lifecycle data support for installation approvalInstallation approval hinges on software data holding at the assigned level. Get an objective-coverage view of DO-178C plans, records, and aDO-254 hardware lifecycle data support for installation approvalDO-254 evidence is measured against the assigned DAL. See where plans, design data, verification, and configuration records fall short beforSafety assessment evidence support for installation approvalA hazard that never lands in a requirement leaves the safety loop open. We trace each one through requirement to evidence across your FHA, PConfiguration management evidence support for installation approvalEvidence generated on one baseline and submitted against another is revision drift. We reconcile baselines, revisions, and release records tConformity records support for installation approval packagesResults from an unconforming test article may not count as evidence. Get an article-to-test eligibility view covering every result your packInstructions for Continued Airworthiness support for installation approvalAn ICA package that lags the modification comes back with findings. We compare maintenance tasks, limitations, and parts coverage to the modFinding and action-item register support for installation approvalA finding marked closed without proof reopens during review. See ownership, evidence links, and closure state for every item in one registerAccomplishment summary support for installation approval packagesReviewers pull the thread on every claim in an accomplishment summary. We test each claim against the evidence behind it: objectives, anomalCompliance matrix support for an ETSO authorizationA matrix row without current evidence is a finding waiting to happen. Get a gap assessment listing every unsupported or stale row before theCertification plan support for an ETSO authorizationYour certification plan is a promise to EASA. We map it against the invoked ETSO and special conditions, then surface the gaps before you coMeans-of-compliance map support for an ETSO authorizationA means-of-compliance label with no evidence path behind it will not clear review. We flag every requirement whose path is broken or missingRequirements traceability support for an ETSO authorizationAn ETSO trace that drops derived or changed requirements draws findings. We list every requirement missing a design or verification link befVerification traceability support for an ETSO authorizationRequirements claimed met with no evidence behind them stall an ETSO review. We trace test, analysis, and inspection results to each claim anDO-160G qualification report support for an ETSO authorizationDO-160G categories the test data does not support sink ETSO reviews. We check limits and installation assumptions against your article and lDO-178C software lifecycle data support for ETSOETSO reviewers work DO-178C data objective by objective. We check plans, standards, and verification records against your software level andDO-254 hardware lifecycle data support for ETSOA DAL assigned on paper but unmet in the data sinks a DO-254 package. We audit plans, design data, and verification before ETSO submittal anSafety assessment support for an ETSO authorizationAn FHA classification that never reaches the design leaves your ETSO safety case exposed. We trace FHA, PSSA, and SSA results to requirementConfiguration management support for an ETSO authorizationOne artifact outside the controlled baseline can unravel an ETSO submittal. We reconcile baselines, revisions, and release records against wConformity records support for ETSO authorizationIf your test specimen lacks a controlled standard, the ETSO data behind it is exposed. We check article identity and build configuration, stInstructions for continued airworthiness support for ETSO authorizationICA gaps against the authorized configuration mean rework after submittal. We check tasks, limitations, and part coverage against your releaFinding and action-item register support for ETSO authorizationFindings marked complete without proof resurface at formal review. We reconcile your ETSO action-item register so every closure has an ownerAccomplishment summary support for ETSO authorizationReviewers follow accomplishment summary claims to source. We verify objective coverage, anomaly disclosure, and lifecycle references, and flCompliance matrix support for an FAA field approvalStale citations and missed regulations in the compliance matrix stall field approvals. We verify coverage and evidence currency before your Certification plan support for an FAA field approvalA certification plan that commits to data your package cannot produce backfires at review. We check basis, affected areas, and commitments aMeans-of-compliance map support for an FAA field approvalA requirement with no method, or a method that never reaches evidence, invites a finding. We map each compliance path in your field approvalRequirements traceability support for an FAA field approvalDerived and changed requirements that drop out of the trace surface late in a field approval. We walk requirements to design to verificationVerification traceability support for an FAA field approvalMarked verified is not the same as verified. We tie test, analysis, and inspection evidence to each field approval requirement and flag thosDO-160 qualification report support for an FAA field approvalYour DO-160G report was run for one install zone, your field approval covers another. Get the list of categories that miss the install.Field-approval DO-178C software lifecycle data supportSoftware lifecycle data gets checked against every DO-178C objective at the assigned level, so your field approval package reaches the FAA wField-approval DO-254 electronic hardware data supportAirborne electronic hardware in a field approval package: we review plans, design data, and verification against your assigned DAL and flag Field-approval safety assessment evidence supportDoes your safety chain hold from FHA through PSSA to SSA? We trace each assessment to requirements and verification, then show you the breakField-approval configuration management data supportIf baselines, revisions, and release records point to two different builds, the FAA notices. We confirm your package resolves to one controlField-approval conformity records supportTest data only counts if the article was conformed. We check article identity and test eligibility across your field approval package and liField-approval instructions for continued airworthiness supportMaintenance tasks, limitations, and parts data drift from the approved configuration. We reconcile your ICA to the as-approved install beforField-approval finding closure register supportItems marked closed with no linked evidence invite findings of their own. We split your field approval register into proven closures and staField-approval accomplishment summary supportWhen your field approval summary claims more than the lifecycle data shows, review stalls. We tie objective coverage and anomaly dispositionType-design data package compliance matrix supportEvery requirement in the basis needs a means of compliance and evidence behind it. We audit your type-design matrix for rows that cannot shoType-design data package certification plan supportCertification plans that promise evidence the package cannot deliver set up a rough review. We compare your type-design plan's commitments tMeans-of-compliance map support for a type-design data packageA means-of-compliance map looks complete until someone works each row. We hand it back marked up, with the status of every row against its rRequirements traceability support for a type-design data packageOrphan requirements and links that end nowhere sink a data package. We score your requirement-to-design-to-verification trace against the ceVerification traceability support for a type-design data packageA requirement is not verified because a status column says so. We rate every verified claim against its test, analysis, inspection, and reviDO-160 environmental qualification report support for a type-design packageTest limits and categories that assume a different install zone surface late in type-design review. We map DO-160G coverage to your installaDO-178C software lifecycle data support for a type-design packageSubmitting DO-178C data in a type-design package? Get an objectives-coverage assessment against your assigned software level while gaps are DO-254 electronic hardware lifecycle data support for a type-design packageReviewers read DO-254 evidence against the assigned DAL. We assess plans, design data, verification, and configuration records for DAL coverSafety assessment support for a type-design data packageSafety results that do not trace to requirements stall a type-design review. We walk the loop from FHA through PSSA to SSA closure and show Configuration management support for a type-design data packageOne stale revision can undo a type-design submittal. We reconcile baselines, revisions, and release records so the evidence matches the contConformity records support for a type-design data packageA test on a nonconforming article can void the evidence behind it. We confirm each test article ties to a controlled configuration and was eInstructions for continued airworthiness support for a type-design packageICA that drift from the approved configuration invite findings. We check tasks, airworthiness limitations, and parts against type design andFinding and action-item register support for a type-design data packageAn open action item with no owner surfaces at the worst moment. We test each register line for ownership, closure evidence, and traceabilityAccomplishment summary support for a type-design data packageYour accomplishment summary asserts objectives are met. We compare each claim with the lifecycle evidence and open problem reports, then namCompliance matrix support for a PMA article approval packageA compliance matrix with stale evidence references stalls FAA review of your PMA article. We surface missing rows and unsupported citations Certification plan support for a PMA article approval packageEvery line in a PMA certification plan is a promise the FAA will collect on. We check the basis, affected areas, and commitments against theMeans-of-compliance map support for a PMA article approval packageAn assigned method with no completed evidence behind it is a finding waiting to happen. We trace each PMA requirement's means of compliance Requirements traceability support for a PMA article approval packageTrace links between requirements, design, and derived items break quietly. We list every broken, missing, or stale link in your PMA package,Verification traceability support for a PMA article approval packageEvery requirement marked complete needs evidence: test, analysis, inspection, or review. We call out the ones in your PMA package that cannoEnvironmental qualification report support for a PMA article approval packageYour DO-160 report must cover the installation, not just the bench. We flag test categories, limits, and assumptions that fall short before Airborne software lifecycle data support for a PMA article approval packagePMA reviewers test DO-178C data against the assigned software level. We audit plans, standards, verification records, and summary, then repo