EASA to TCCA import
EASA to TCCA equipment list and configuration records transition review
This review confirms whether an EASA-registered aircraft's equipment list and configuration records will hold up when Transport Canada examines the import. A records specialist runs it before the acceptance package is submitted, from the importing side. It reconciles the recorded equipment list against installation records, release certificates, and the modification approvals that authorized each fitment, then flags equipment a Canadian reviewer will question because its European approval basis needs to be shown. You receive an equipment-to-approval map, a gap list keyed to the import questions, and a document request set for the installation and approval records that are missing.
When this review is needed
- An EASA aircraft is being imported to Canada and its equipment list has to match what is installed and traceable.
- Equipment was added under European minor modifications or STC installations that a Canadian reviewer will want traced.
- The equipment list and the current mass-and-balance configuration disagree and the import package is on hold until they reconcile.
- Buyer-furnished or cabin equipment was fitted whose installation approval needs assembling for the acceptance submission.
The problem
An equipment list maintained under EASA practice records what is installed and, ideally, the approval each item was fitted under, but that link is where the file most often thins. Cabin, avionics, and optional equipment accumulate over an aircraft's life through minor modifications and STC installations, and the approval record for a given item tends to sit apart from the list that names it. When the aircraft imports to Canada, Transport Canada asks how each installed item was approved, and an equipment list that reads complete can still leave the approval basis for individual fitments unaccounted for.
What gets reviewed
- The recorded equipment list checked item by item against installation records for the serial number
- Each installed item traced to the minor modification, STC, or approval that authorized it
- Configuration entries reconciled to the current mass-and-balance and cabin layout
- Optional and buyer-furnished equipment confirmed as recorded and supported
- Items whose approval basis is European-specific flagged for the Canadian reviewer
- The equipment list compared to the type design to catch unrecorded fitments
Scope this review
Tell us the asset, the event, and the evidence in scope, and we will outline a focused first engagement.
Send a representative, redacted record set and we will scope the review.
What gets validated
- Every item on the equipment list is backed by an installation record naming its approval basis
- STC and minor-modification installations carry approval data a Canadian reviewer can follow
- The equipment list agrees with the mass-and-balance configuration and cabin layout in force
- Serial numbers on installed equipment reconcile with the installation and removal records
- No item is installed and flying that the recorded configuration fails to list
Evidence normally required
- The current equipment list and configuration status for the serial number
- Installation records, work packages, and release certificates for added equipment
- STC and minor-modification approvals for embodied items
- Current mass-and-balance report and cabin configuration data
- Any TCCA import correspondence bearing on equipment approvals
Common discrepancies
- An item on the equipment list with no installation record naming its approval basis
- A European minor modification whose approval does not travel with the aircraft
- Cabin or avionics equipment installed that the configuration record never captured
- A mass-and-balance configuration that lists equipment the master list omits
What is at stake
An installed item that cannot be traced to acceptable approval data becomes an open item on the import, and the aircraft waits while the installation record or approval is reconstructed. An item whose approval basis was European-specific may need validation before Transport Canada accepts it, and one that cannot be substantiated at all may have to be removed, which is disruptive and costly once the airplane has repositioned for handover.
How the work runs
Pull the recorded configuration
Assemble the equipment list, mass-and-balance, and configuration status the records assert for the serial number.
Trace each item to its approval
Match every installed item to the STC, minor modification, or approval that authorized it.
Reconcile against the airframe history
Confirm the list, the loading data, and the installation records agree.
Build the gap and request set
Log each unsupported item and name the document that closes it for the reviewer.
What the buyer receives
- An equipment-to-approval map linking each installed item to its authorizing approval
- A gap list organized around the questions the Canadian reviewer will raise
- A document request set naming the missing records and where to source them
Who uses the output
- Importers assembling the equipment evidence in the TCCA acceptance package
- Records teams reconciling the equipment list before the aircraft repositions
- Asset managers pricing the cost of any fitment that cannot be traced
How the work fits into the transaction or program
Equipment-list reconciliation runs with the modification and release-document reviews, since an installed item is often the same object those reviews trace through their own lens. What it produces becomes part of the configuration evidence Transport Canada examines, and its gap list feeds the export package that consolidates the whole import before handover.
Start with a single asset
Confirm the status list matches the underlying evidence.
Jurisdiction-specific considerations
The installed equipment does not change on import, but its approval basis has to be shown in a form Transport Canada can follow, and a European minor modification or STC may need a validation path rather than acceptance on its face. An item that was approved and flying under EASA can still raise an import question until that basis is assembled for the receiving authority.
Regulatory limits
This review reconciles the recorded equipment against its approval evidence and prepares that evidence for examination. It does not approve any installation, validate an STC or minor modification, or determine that the aircraft is airworthy in its imported configuration, which remain decisions for Transport Canada.
What this review does not cover
- Physical inspection or configuration survey of the installed equipment
- Obtaining or validating approval data for an unsupported installation
- Submitting the import application or corresponding with the authority on your behalf
Specific to this review
- Cabin and optional equipment is where an EASA equipment list most often thins, because those fitments were approved as minor modifications whose data lived apart from the list.
- A configuration that reconciles to the equipment list but not to mass-and-balance is a recurring import question, since Transport Canada reads both against each other.
- An item approved and flying under EASA can still need a validation path before the Canadian import accepts it, which is a timing risk the reconciliation surfaces early.
Sources
U.S. Government (eCFR). Maintenance recordkeeping content and approval-for-return-to-service requirements, including 43.9, 43.11, and Appendix B.
Federal Aviation Administration. Completion and use of FAA Form 8130-3, Authorized Release Certificate, for new and used parts.
European Union / EASA. Continuing airworthiness, maintenance records, CAMO responsibilities, and the airworthiness review process in the EASA system.
U.S. Government (eCFR). Export airworthiness approval requirements and special requirements of an importing authority.
European Union / EASA. EASA design and production certification, STCs, ETSO authorizations, and EASA Form 1 release.
Frequently asked questions
Our EASA equipment list looks complete, so why run this before a TCCA import?
A complete-looking list still has to show how each installed item was approved, and cabin and optional equipment fitted under minor modifications often have their approval data filed apart from the list. Transport Canada asks for that basis on import, and some items may need a validation path, so reconciling early avoids a hold once the aircraft has moved.
Relevant glossary terms
Related pages
Where this fits
Talk to an engineer who has done this work
We will walk through your current state, the records or evidence involved, and a scoped first engagement.
Talk through the aircraft, records, evidence, deadline, and next useful step.